<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Missouri Lawyers Media &#187; Court of Appeals, Eastern District</title>
	<atom:link href="http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/category/opinions/courts/court-of-appeals-eastern-district/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://molawyersmedia.com</link>
	<description>Missouri legal news and public notices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 06:02:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Public Utilities: Rate Adjustment &#8211; Refund&#160;</title>
		<link>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/19/public-utilities-rate-adjustment-refund/</link>
		<comments>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/19/public-utilities-rate-adjustment-refund/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 19:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Maniscalco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court of Appeals, Eastern District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rate Adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Refund]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://molawyersmedia.com/?p=239761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State ex rel. Union Electric Company v. Public Service Commission (MLW No. 64999/Case No. WD75403 – 44 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, Martin, J.)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/19/public-utilities-rate-adjustment-refund/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domestic Relations: Sale Of Residence &#8211; Time Frame&#160;</title>
		<link>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/19/domestic-relations-sale-of-residence-time-frame/</link>
		<comments>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/19/domestic-relations-sale-of-residence-time-frame/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 19:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Maniscalco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court of Appeals, Eastern District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Law opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sale Of Residence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Frame]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://molawyersmedia.com/?p=239757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where a trial court ordered the sale of the marital residence in a dissolution but failed to set a time limit for the sale, the judgment is remanded for clarification, and because the sale affects the maintenance award, and division of property and debts, these issues are reversed and remanded for a new trial as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/19/domestic-relations-sale-of-residence-time-frame/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Criminal Law: DWI &#8211; ATV &#8211; Sufficiency Of Evidence&#160;</title>
		<link>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/19/criminal-law-dwi-atv-sufficiency-of-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/19/criminal-law-dwi-atv-sufficiency-of-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 19:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Maniscalco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court of Appeals, Eastern District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sufficiency Of Evidence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://molawyersmedia.com/?p=239755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State v. Gittemeier (MLW No. 64994/Case No. ED98399 – 12 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Clayton III, J.) ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/19/criminal-law-dwi-atv-sufficiency-of-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Administrative: Permit Application &#8211; Condition &#8211; Authority&#160;</title>
		<link>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/19/administrative-permit-application-condition-authority/</link>
		<comments>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/19/administrative-permit-application-condition-authority/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 18:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Maniscalco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court of Appeals, Eastern District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Administrative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Permit Application]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://molawyersmedia.com/?p=239753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saxony Lutheran High School v. Missouri Department of Natural Resources and Missouri Land Reclamation Commission (MLW No. 64993/Case No. ED99038 – 16 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Gaertner Jr., C.J.)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/19/administrative-permit-application-condition-authority/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Negligence : Wrongful Death &#8211; Punitive Damages &#8211; Sanctions&#160;</title>
		<link>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/13/negligence-wrongful-death-punitive-damages-sanctions/</link>
		<comments>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/13/negligence-wrongful-death-punitive-damages-sanctions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 17:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Maniscalco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court of Appeals, Eastern District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury & Torts Law opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Punitive Damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wrongful death]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://molawyersmedia.com/?p=239505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(1)Where the parents of five individuals who died in an airplane crash on a skydiving outing brought strict liability claims against the turbine blades manufacturer, the trial court did not err in instructing the jury that the plaintiffs could recover for the decedents’ pain and suffering based on pre-impact terror, and there was substantial evidence [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/13/negligence-wrongful-death-punitive-damages-sanctions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Negligence: Damages &#8211; Pain And Suffering &#8211; Vicarious Liability&#160;</title>
		<link>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/13/negligence-damages-pain-and-suffering-vicarious-liability/</link>
		<comments>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/13/negligence-damages-pain-and-suffering-vicarious-liability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 17:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Maniscalco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court of Appeals, Eastern District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury & Torts Law opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pain And Suffering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vicarious liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://molawyersmedia.com/?p=239503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meier v. Schrock (MLW No. 64969/Case No. ED98728 – 14 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Hoff, J.) ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/13/negligence-damages-pain-and-suffering-vicarious-liability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Criminal Law: Newly Discovered Evidence &#8211; Hearsay &#8211; Statutory Sodomy&#160;</title>
		<link>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/13/criminal-law-newly-discovered-evidence-hearsay-statutory-sodomy/</link>
		<comments>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/13/criminal-law-newly-discovered-evidence-hearsay-statutory-sodomy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 17:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Maniscalco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court of Appeals, Eastern District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hearsay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newly Discovered Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statutory sodomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://molawyersmedia.com/?p=239498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State v. Hannon (MLW No. 64971/Case No. ED96915 – 18 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Cohen, J.)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/13/criminal-law-newly-discovered-evidence-hearsay-statutory-sodomy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insurance: Duty To Defend &#8211; Auto Repossession &#8211; ‘Occurrence’&#160;</title>
		<link>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/04/insurance-duty-to-defend-auto-repossession-occurrence/</link>
		<comments>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/04/insurance-duty-to-defend-auto-repossession-occurrence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 20:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Maniscalco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Practice opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court of Appeals, Eastern District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto Repossession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duty to defend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occurrence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://molawyersmedia.com/?p=239207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allen v. Continental Western Insurance Company (MLW No. 64947/Case No. ED99111 – 13 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Richter, J.)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/04/insurance-duty-to-defend-auto-repossession-occurrence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Criminal Law: Incriminating Statements &#8211; Miranda &#8211; Chain Of Custody&#160;</title>
		<link>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/04/criminal-law-incriminating-statements-miranda-chain-of-custody/</link>
		<comments>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/04/criminal-law-incriminating-statements-miranda-chain-of-custody/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 20:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Maniscalco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court of Appeals, Eastern District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chain Of Custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incriminating Statements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miranda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://molawyersmedia.com/?p=239205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State v. Pennell (MLW No. 64948/Case No. ED97678 – 20 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Richter, J.)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/05/04/criminal-law-incriminating-statements-miranda-chain-of-custody/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Negligence: Subsequent Remedial Measures  &#8211; Non-Party &#8211; Admissibility&#160;</title>
		<link>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/04/27/negligence-subsequent-remedial-measures-non-party-admissibility/</link>
		<comments>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/04/27/negligence-subsequent-remedial-measures-non-party-admissibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 16:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Maniscalco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court of Appeals, Eastern District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury & Torts Law opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Admissibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsequent Remedial Measures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://molawyersmedia.com/?p=238876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Emerson v. The Garvin Group (MLW No. 64900/Case No. ED98536 – 10 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Norton, J.) ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://molawyersmedia.com/blog/2013/04/27/negligence-subsequent-remedial-measures-non-party-admissibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
