MO Lawyers Media Staff//July 19, 1993
Design Defect – Industrial Trash Compactor
Type of Action: Product liability
Type of Injuries: Fractured jaw, cervical spine surgery, psychological
Court/Case #/Date: St. Louis City Circuit Court/892-10049-Div.1/June 3, 1993
Caption: Matlock v. Midwest Waste, Inc., et al.
Judge or Jury Case: Jury
Name of Judge: Judge Robert Dierker
Damages: $625,000 – past and future lost wages for Donald Matlock, $160,000 for Shirley Matlock, $1.8 million total
Settlement or Verdict: Verdict for defendant
Allocation of Fault: N/A
Highest Settlement Offer: $85,000
Last Demand: $500,000 from Midwest, $250,000 from ECO Systems
Attorneys for Defendant: Ted MacDonald, Steve Jones
Insurance Carrier: EMC Underwriters for Midwest Waste, Travelers Insurance Co. for ECO
Plaintiff’s Experts: Dr. Bud Chomhirun, medical; Richard Hrach, liability
Defendant’s Experts: Dr. Patrick Hogan, Dr. Herbert Rosenbaum
Facts of the Case: Plaintiff caught his head and arm in the lifting arm of an industrial trash compactor while employed at a GM plant. He had two surgeries resulting in fusion at four levels of the cervical spine and claimed a change in personality. Plaintiff claimed the system which was distributed and installed by ECO at GM had a product design defect. Midwest leased the system from ECO and re-leased it to GM.
Negligence
Wrongful Death – Failure To Warn – Independent Contractor
Type of Action: Wrongful death
Court/Case #/Date: St. Louis City Circuit Court/902-990
Caption: Kitzman v. B.F. Goodrich, Co., Inc. and RJF International Co.
Judge or Jury Case: Jury
Settlement or Verdict: $800,000
Allocation of Fault: 100 percent to RJF International
Attorney for Defendant: Morris B. Chapman
Insurance Carrier: Self-insured
Plaintiff’s Experts: E. Patrick McGuire, William Dunlop
Defendant’s Experts: John Hartmann
Facts of the Case: Decedent was helping his employer install a vinyl gasoline tank cover at a filling station. RJF Industries was the manufacturer and supplier of the cover. While decedent was nailing the vinyl to the vertical sidewall of the excavation, it collapsed and killed him. The plaintiff originally sued RJF Industries and B. F. Goodrich, the predecessor manufacturing company, which had prepared a video showing the liner was to be applied on a vertical sidewall. The station owner was also joined initially, but was dismissed on his motion by virtue of the recent Supreme Court holding that an owner was no longer responsible for the acts of an independent contractor involved in a hazardous undertaking to an employee of the contractor covered by workers’ compensation. The case then proceeded against RJF on the basis of its failure to warn the manufacturer of a product that was not reasonably safe for the use intended. The decedent’s employer was charged and fined because of numerous violations of the code which required sloped or buttressed sides on any excavation exceeding five feet. Decedent was survived by his wife, mother and father.
Contract
Partnership Denied – Fraud
Type of Action: Fraud, breach of partnership agreement, conversion
Type of Injuries: Lost value of business
Court/Case #/Date: Jackson County Circuit Court/CV89-022893
Caption: Schreibman v. Zanetti & Katcher
Judge or Jury Case: Jury
Name of Judge: Judge John I. Moran
Damages: $525,000 – value of business; $48,230 – value of fixtures; $75,000 – commissions
Settlement or Verdict: $2,078,230 verdict for plaintiff
Allocation of Fault: N/A
Highest Settlement Offer: $150,000 from defendant Katcher
Last Demand: $450,000
Attorneys for Plaintiff: Scott Mach, Dennis Egan
Insurance Carrier: None
Plaintiff’s Experts: Steven Walter, business valuations
Defendant’s Experts: Joseph Singer, PhD economist
Facts of the Case: Plaintiff and Zanetti were married in 1978 when they entered into a partnership with defendant Katcher to sell giftware in Katcher’s five-state exclusive territory and operate a showroom. Katcher notified plaintiff in 1985 that he was terminating the relationship, and plaintiff demanded his share of the partnership business. Katcher denied partnership. Plaintiff and Zanetti divorced and agreed to split profits in their separation agreement. Zanetti failed to do so.