Where an insurer in an auto accident case appealed the trial court’s determination that the tortfeasor was operating an uninsured vehicle, under the law-of-the-case doctrine the issue may not be revisited, and the insurer also failed to demonstrate that the court erred in stacking the policies or in finding the phrase “the same damages” to be ambiguous.
Judgment is affirmed.
Adams v. King (MLW No. 62969/Case No. SD30898 – 6 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Rahmeyer, J.) Appealed from circuit court, Oregon County, Swindle, Sp. J. (Samuel P. Spain for appellant) (E. Ryan Bradley for respondent).
Read the full text of this opinion. (PDF)