Even though a motion court erroneously dismissed for lack of jurisdiction a defendant’s motion to reopen his Rule 27.26 proceedings, the court reviewed the motion and properly found that the defendant did not make a claim of abandonment, and the defendant was not entitled to an evidentiary hearing.
Judgment is affirmed.
Jensen v. State (MLW No. 64580/Case No. WD74585 – 13 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, Ellis, J.) Appealed from circuit court, Johnson County, Witt, J. (Mitchell A. Jensen, pro se) (Shaun Mackelprang for respondent).
Read the full text of this opinion. (PDF)