Where a defendant who pleaded guilty to bank fraud and identity theft was denied his motion to reopen, which he brought to challenge a restitution order that he claimed violated the 90-day deadline, the judgment is reversed because the notice provided to the defendant prior to the entry of the restitution order was not reasonable under the circumstances.
Judgment is reversed.
U.S. v. Adejumo (MLW No. 67416/Case No. 14-1820 – 6 pages) (U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, Murphy, J.) Appealed from U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, Davis, J. (Jordan S. Kushner, Minneapolis, argued for appellant) (Lolita A. VelazquezAguilu, Minneapolis, argued for appellee).