Where a petitioner who sought a withholding of removal and to reopen his removal proceedings argued that changed country conditions in Guatemala excused the untimeliness of his motion, the denial of the motion is affirmed because documents submitted did not show a material change in conditions and the petitioner did not demonstrate that his relatives’ deaths in 2010 and 2011 reflected changed circumstances.
Judgment is affirmed.
Villatoro-Ochoa v. Lynch (MLW No. 70066/Case No. 15-3103 – 6 pages) (U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, Melloy, J.) Petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Allan Harvey Bell, Kansas City, Missouri, for petitioner) (Ashley Young Martin, Washington, D.C., for respondent).