Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Law : Wire Fraud – Money Laundering – Sufficiency Of Evidence

Stephanie Maniscalco//February 9, 2018

Criminal Law : Wire Fraud – Money Laundering – Sufficiency Of Evidence

Stephanie Maniscalco//February 9, 2018

Where a defendant challenged his convictions for conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering, the judgment is affirmed because the government presented ample evidence of the defendant’s participation in the conspiracy, and the defendant did not show that the government’s questioning during its case in chief and comments during closing argument was improper vouching.

Judgment is affirmed.

U.S. v. Atkins (MLW No. 71383/Case No. 17-1074 – 9 pages) (U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, Beam, J.) Appealed from U.S. District Court, Western District of Arkansas, Hickey, J. (Glen R. Hines, Springdale, Arkansas, argued for appellant) (David R. Ferguson, Fort Smith, Arkansas, argued for appellee).

Read the full text of this opinion. (PDF)

Latest Opinion Digests

See all digests

Top stories

See more news