Where a hotel housekeeper supervisor brought claims of age discrimination and retaliation against her former employer, the plaintiff did not establish a specific link between any age discrimination and her termination, and she did not provide any direct evidence that she was fired for taking protected leave, and summary judgment for the defendant is affirmed because the plaintiff also did not show that she was retaliated against due to her deposition testimony.
Judgment is affirmed.
Naguib v. Trimark Hotel Corporation (MLW No. 72106/Case No. 17-1560 – 8 pages) (U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, Smith, J.) Appealed from U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, Ericksen, J. (Sheila Ann Engelmeier, Minneapolis, argued for appellant; Thomas E. Marshall and Michael E. Gerould appeared on the brief) (Patrick Robert Martin, Minneapolis, argued for appellee; Stephanie J. Willing appeared on the brief).