Where a defendant challenged her convictions for wire fraud, money laundering and tax evasion, the judgment is affirmed because the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions, and the defendant did not show that the district court erred in refusing to sever a false-statements charge, in admitting IRS agent statements or in the indictment or jury instructions.
Judgment is affirmed.
U.S. v. Pearson (MLW No. 73182/Case No. 17-1438 – 6 pages) (U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, per curiam) Appealed from U.S. District Court, Western District of Missouri.