Staff Report//September 18, 2019
Staff Report//September 18, 2019
Where a defendant in a child-molestation case challenged the admission of the testimony of a witness regarding prior incidents of uncharged child molestation that allegedly occurred decades earlier, the testimony corroborated the victim’s testimony and was admissible propensity evidence, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion.
Judgment is affirmed.
State v. Banks (MLW No.73907/Case No. ED106772 – 11 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Odenwald, J.) Appealed from circuit court, St. Louis City, David L. Dowd, J. (Amy E. Lowe for appellant) (Julia E. Rives for respondent).