Where a claimant challenged the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income, substantial evidence supported a finding by the administrative law judge that the claimant’s speech apraxia was not disabling, so the judgment is affirmed.
Judgment is affirmed.
Woods v. Saul (MLW No. 74057/Case No. 19-1215 – 2 pages) (U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, per curiam) Appealed from U.S. District Court, Western District of Missouri.