Civil Practice: Summary Judgment-Civil Conspiracy

Where appellant challenged the grant of partial summary judgment to respondent on her claim of conspiracy to set fire to her mobile home, the disputes raised by the appellant did not raise genuine issues of material fact but were merely argumentative, so summary judgment was proper, and the court did not err in granting summary judgment on the issue of liability because the undisputed facts established that the respondent was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Judgment is affirmed.

Green v. Fotoohighiam (MLW No. 74063/Case No. WD82344 – 15 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, Mitchell, J.) Appealed from circuit court, Boone County, Koffman, J. (Matthew B. Woods and Andrew L. Veatch, Columbia, for respondent) (Michael G. Berry, Theodore L. Lynch and John T. Brooks, Jefferson City, for appellant).