Where a defendant challenged his sentence in a drug-conspiracy case, the district court did not err in denying the request for safety-valve relief because he conveyed only the basic facts of the crime and failed to provide a complete and truthful proffer, so the judgment is affirmed.
Judgment is affirmed.
U.S. v. Tran (MLW No. 74135/Case No. 18-3159 – 4 pages) (U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, per curiam) Appealed from U.S. District Court, Southern District of Iowa.