Where a petitioner from Laos challenged the refusal of his motion to reopen his case, the petitioner did not raise a colorable constitutional claim, and the decision not to reopen was not reviewable, and the petitions are denied because the court also rejects the argument that it may review under a theory that allows review when the board relies on an “incorrect legal premises.”
Vue v. Barr (MLW No. 74762/Case No. 18-2595 – 7 pages) (U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, Stras, J.) Petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (John Robert Bruning, Minneapolis, for respondent) (Erica B. Miles, Washington, D.C., for respondent).