Workers’ Compensation: Challenge to Awards-Hampton-Framework

Where appellants argued that workers’ compensation awards were contrary to the overwhelming weight of the competent and substantial evidence, the arguments ignored the framework required under Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, so the appellants’ arguments lacked persuasive or analytical value, and the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment is affirmed.

The Doe Run Company v. Fenwick (MLW No. 75005/Case No. S36499 – 3 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Scott, J.) Appealed from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission.