Appellate Practice: Inadequate Brief-Property Damage Claim

Where a pro se appellant challenged the denial of his motion for a new trial after a jury verdict in favor of defendant on the claims of property damage to an automobile, the appellate brief was inadequate under Rule 84.04, and the appeal is dismissed.

Appeal is dismissed.

Roesch v. Birch-Edmundson (MLW No. 79902/Case No. ED111018 – 6 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Page, J.) Appealed from circuit court, St. Louis County, Newsham, J. (Martin R. Minnigerode and Daniel R. Schramm for respondent) (Aaron Roesch, pro se).