Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Jury returns modest verdict in mixed-fault consumer protection suit

Kallie Cox//January 26, 2026//

A judge's gavel resting sideways on a block, which is reflected on a dark table

Depositphotos.com image

Jury returns modest verdict in mixed-fault consumer protection suit

Kallie Cox//January 26, 2026//

Listen to this article
Summary:
  • Jury rejected and warranty claims
  • Defendant found 75% at fault on claim
  • Plaintiff awarded $28,000 despite over $100,000 in legal fees
  • Case involved alleged engine damage to a Mercedes-Benz after repair

A held a jury trial where a plaintiff sought damages under various consumer protection laws. The jury found the claims wanting and found the defendant partially responsible for just one of the claims, resulting in a verdict that was less than the plaintiff’s legal fees to bring the suit.

The plaintiff, Mary Moss, was represented by attorneys Isaac J. Bressler, Dominic M. Pontello and Theodore Norwood of Pontello, Bressler, Norwood & Associates in St. Charles.

Moss and her attorneys filed suit against in St. Louis, claiming that the business damaged the engine of her 2013 Mercedes-Benz S550.

According to her attorneys, Moss took her vehicle to Asbury for an engine wiring harness repair and after this, the engine began to lock up.

Asbury automotive was represented by Corey L. Kraushaar and Maxim D. Van Houtte of Brown & James in St. Louis.

The plaintiff’s attorneys brought claims against the defendant under the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act, and negligence.

The jury ruled in favor of Asbury on two of the claims — the one involving the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act and the breach of warranty — and found the business partially at fault on the negligence claim.

Moss was awarded $28,000 after the jury found her to be 25 percent at fault, and the defendant was 75 percent at fault on the negligence claim.

According to information sent to Missouri Lawyers Media, Moss had over $100,000 in attorneys’ fees and her final pre-trial demand was for $40,000.

The attorneys listed no expert witnesses for either side and neither the plaintiff’s attorneys nor the defendant’s responded to requests for comment.

RELATED: Click to search for and submit your Verdicts & Settlements

Amount of verdict, judgment or settlement: $28,000

Type of action: Consumer protection

Allocation of Fault: for Defendant on the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act claim. Jury verdict for Defendant on the Breach of Warranty claim. Jury found Plaintiff 25 percent at fault, and Defendant 75 percent at fault on the Negligence claim.

Venue: St. Louis County Circuit Court

Case Number/Date: 22SL-CC02316 / 11/19/2025

Judge: Ellen Levy

Injuries: Property damage to the engine of plaintiff’s 2013 Mercedes Benz S550

Last Pretrial Demand: $40,000

Caption: Mary Moss v. Asbury Automotive St. Louis, LLC

Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: Isaac J. Bressler, Dominic M. Pontello and Theodore Norwood of Pontello, Bressler, Norwood & Associates in St. Charles, Missouri.

Defendants’ Attorneys: Corey L. Kraushaar & Maxim D. Van Houtte of Brown & James in St. Louis, Missouri.

Legal Tech

See All Legal Tech News

Latest Opinion Digests

See all digests

Top stories

See more news