Jury returns modest verdict in mixed-fault consumer protection suit
Kallie Cox//January 26, 2026//
Summary:
- Jury rejected Missouri Merchandising Practices Act and warranty claims
- Defendant found 75% at fault on negligence claim
- Plaintiff awarded $28,000 despite over $100,000 in legal fees
- Case involved alleged engine damage to a Mercedes-Benz after repair
A St. Louis County circuit court held a jury trial where a plaintiff sought damages under various consumer protection laws. The jury found the claims wanting and found the defendant partially responsible for just one of the claims, resulting in a verdict that was less than the plaintiff’s legal fees to bring the suit.
The plaintiff, Mary Moss, was represented by attorneys Isaac J. Bressler, Dominic M. Pontello and Theodore Norwood of Pontello, Bressler, Norwood & Associates in St. Charles.
Moss and her attorneys filed suit against Asbury Automotive in St. Louis, claiming that the business damaged the engine of her 2013 Mercedes-Benz S550.
According to her attorneys, Moss took her vehicle to Asbury for an engine wiring harness repair and after this, the engine began to lock up.
Asbury automotive was represented by Corey L. Kraushaar and Maxim D. Van Houtte of Brown & James in St. Louis.
The plaintiff’s attorneys brought claims against the defendant under the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act, breach of warranty and negligence.
The jury ruled in favor of Asbury on two of the claims — the one involving the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act and the breach of warranty — and found the business partially at fault on the negligence claim.
Moss was awarded $28,000 after the jury found her to be 25 percent at fault, and the defendant was 75 percent at fault on the negligence claim.
According to information sent to Missouri Lawyers Media, Moss had over $100,000 in attorneys’ fees and her final pre-trial demand was for $40,000.
The attorneys listed no expert witnesses for either side and neither the plaintiff’s attorneys nor the defendant’s responded to requests for comment.
RELATED: Click to search for and submit your Verdicts & Settlements
Amount of verdict, judgment or settlement: $28,000
Type of action: Consumer protection
Allocation of Fault: Jury verdict for Defendant on the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act claim. Jury verdict for Defendant on the Breach of Warranty claim. Jury found Plaintiff 25 percent at fault, and Defendant 75 percent at fault on the Negligence claim.
Venue: St. Louis County Circuit Court
Case Number/Date: 22SL-CC02316 / 11/19/2025
Judge: Ellen Levy
Injuries: Property damage to the engine of plaintiff’s 2013 Mercedes Benz S550
Last Pretrial Demand: $40,000
Caption: Mary Moss v. Asbury Automotive St. Louis, LLC
Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: Isaac J. Bressler, Dominic M. Pontello and Theodore Norwood of Pontello, Bressler, Norwood & Associates in St. Charles, Missouri.
Defendants’ Attorneys: Corey L. Kraushaar & Maxim D. Van Houtte of Brown & James in St. Louis, Missouri.
Related Articles
Legal Tech
- New dedicated coverage of tech challenges facing law firms and legal departments
- Gemini Legal launches DraftEngine for civil litigation forms
- Lawyers continue to grapple with AI ethical issues
Latest Opinion Digests
- Insurance-Interpleader-Competing Claims to Insurance Proceeds
- Employer-Employee-Discrimination-Hostile Work Environment
- Criminal Law-Rape-Oral and Written Judgments
- Torts-Defamation-Official Immunity
- Real Property-Adverse Possession-Oral Agreement for Sale
- Domestic Relations-Termination of Parental Rights-Parental Unfitness
- Criminal Law-Violation of Order of Protection-Scope of Cross-Examination
Top stories
- 8th Circuit affirms denial of preliminary injunction against SB 751
- New dedicated coverage of tech challenges facing law firms and legal departments
- Parity Act claim against insurer for child’s treatment survives motion to dismiss
- ABA opinion addresses client restrictions in engagement letters
- U.S. District Court allows plaintiffs to amend complaint alleging fraud
- AAA Insurance faces $21.5M bad faith verdict in Clay County
- Legal Limelight: Meghan S. Largent champions landowners in takings cases
- Supreme Court rejects bright-line rule on FAA worker exemption





