Criminal Law-Felon in Possession of Firearm-ACCA Enhancement-Predicate Offenses
Staff Report//February 11, 2026//
Defendant appealed the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm. Defendant challenged the district court’s imposition of an ACCA enhancement, arguing that his prior Arkansas convictions for terroristic threatening, residential burglary, aggravated assault and battery were not violent felonies, and that his indictment should have identified which of his felonies would be considered predicate offenses. Defendant further argued that a jury should have decided whether his predicate offenses occurred on different occasions from one another.
Where the court had previously ruled the Arkansas offenses were violent offenses, there was no error in applying the ACCA enhancement where defendant was not entitled to prior notice of the specific predicate offenses and where the district court could determine the timing of those offenses.
Judgment is affirmed.
U.S. v. Venson (MLW No. 84326/Case No. 24-3092 – 3 pages) (U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, per curiam) Appealed from U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas, Baker, J.
Legal Tech
- New dedicated coverage of tech challenges facing law firms and legal departments
- Gemini Legal launches DraftEngine for civil litigation forms
- Lawyers continue to grapple with AI ethical issues
Latest Opinion Digests
- Insurance-Interpleader-Competing Claims to Insurance Proceeds
- Employer-Employee-Discrimination-Hostile Work Environment
- Criminal Law-Rape-Oral and Written Judgments
- Torts-Defamation-Official Immunity
- Real Property-Adverse Possession-Oral Agreement for Sale
- Domestic Relations-Termination of Parental Rights-Parental Unfitness
- Criminal Law-Violation of Order of Protection-Scope of Cross-Examination
Top stories
- New dedicated coverage of tech challenges facing law firms and legal departments
- Parity Act claim against insurer for child’s treatment survives motion to dismiss
- ABA opinion addresses client restrictions in engagement letters
- U.S. District Court allows plaintiffs to amend complaint alleging fraud
- AAA Insurance faces $21.5M bad faith verdict in Clay County
- Legal Limelight: Meghan S. Largent champions landowners in takings cases
- Supreme Court rejects bright-line rule on FAA worker exemption
- 2026 Unsung Legal Heroes: Publisher’s Letter, honorees





