Defense prevails in rear-end collision case as jury fixates on damages
Kallie Cox//February 26, 2026//
Summary:
- Defense verdict in rear-end motor vehicle collision case in Jackson County Circuit Court
- Plaintiff sought $3.2 million for alleged back and spine injuries
- Jury reportedly focused on lack of supporting evidence for future damages
- Dispute centered on expert chiropractic testimony and damages proof
After a jury was stuck in a debate over damages, the defendant in a motor vehicle collision with a minor won her case.
Angel Mata, represented by James C. Meyers and Niki T. Long of Franke Schultz & Mullen in Kansas City, was involved in a rear-end crash with A.B. (a minor). Meyers said the crash happened in the middle of morning rush hour on I-35 in Johnson County, Kansas in 2023.
Traffic slowed and Mata collided with the back of the plaintiff’s car.
A.B. and her mother Rikita Holmes, as next friend, asked for $3,215,283.00 in opening and closing arguments during the jury trial, claiming A.B. suffered back and spine injuries. A chiropractor testified as plaintiffs’ expert witness.
“Overall, I think what led to the verdict was the plaintiff’s damages and their presentation of their damages was, in my view, wanting of supporting evidence,” he said. “They were going after future damages. They did not submit any medical billings to the jury and they had two witnesses.”
One of these two witnesses was Holmes who described A.B.’s experience, and the other was a chiropractor who appeared via videotaped depositions.
“In my presentation of the evidence, I pretty much pointed out how the chiropractor expert that they were relying on seemed to change his opinions from one deposition to the other and didn’t really lend any credence to the future damages that they were asking the jury to return,” Meyers said.
The amount demanded juxtaposed by the evidence presented seemed to confuse the jury, he added.
“What I think they got hung up on was on the verdict director, the word damages,” Meyers said. “I think they just got hung up on that, and they weren’t able to return a verdict without any real competent evidence and damages is kind of my suspicion.”
Gage Fletcher, of the Fletcher Law Office in Kansas City, represented A.B. and Holmes and did not respond to a request for comment.
RELATED: Click to search for and submit your Verdicts & Settlements
Amount of verdict, judgment or settlement: Defense verdict
Type of action: Motor vehicle collision
Breakdown: Plaintiff asked for $3,215,283.00 in opening and closing during their trial by jury.
Venue: Jackson County Circuit Court
Case Number/Date: 2416-CV15690 / 01/14/2026
Judge: Patrick Edwards
Plaintiffs’ Experts: Dr. Shane Bisson, DC, chiropractor with Acute Injury Rehab a/k/a Auto Accident Urgent Care in Leawood, Kansas.
Defendants’ Experts: Dr. David Clymer, MD, orthopedic surgeon with Kansas City Orthopedic Alliance in Overland, Kansas.
Injuries: Back, spine.
Last Pretrial Demand: $100,000
Last Pretrial Offer: Policy Limits ($25,000)
Caption: A.B., A minor, by and through her Next Friend and Mother, Rikita Holmes v. Angel Mata
Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: Gage Fletcher of the Fletcher Law Office, Kansas City.
Defendants’ Attorneys: James C. Meyers & Niki T. Long of Franke Schultz & Mullen, Kansas City.
Related Articles
Legal Tech
- How ransomware tactics against law firms are changing
- How large language models are leveling the personal injury playing field
- Attorney Share, Lawmatics integrate to automate law firm referrals
Latest Opinion Digests
- Insurance-Interpleader-Competing Claims to Insurance Proceeds
- Employer-Employee-Discrimination-Hostile Work Environment
- Criminal Law-Rape-Oral and Written Judgments
- Torts-Defamation-Official Immunity
- Real Property-Adverse Possession-Oral Agreement for Sale
- Domestic Relations-Termination of Parental Rights-Parental Unfitness
- Criminal Law-Violation of Order of Protection-Scope of Cross-Examination
Top stories
- Injured motorist recovers policy limits, plus medical damages in under a year
- Mother obtains six-figure settlement after rear-end crash leads to lifelong pain
- 8th Circuit affirms denial of preliminary injunction against SB 751
- New dedicated coverage of tech challenges facing law firms and legal departments
- Parity Act claim against insurer for child’s treatment survives motion to dismiss
- ABA opinion addresses client restrictions in engagement letters
- U.S. District Court allows plaintiffs to amend complaint alleging fraud
- AAA Insurance faces $21.5M bad faith verdict in Clay County





