Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Law: Child Molestation-Admission of Uncharged Acts

Staff Report//April 16, 2026//

Criminal Law: Child Molestation-Admission of Uncharged Acts

Staff Report//April 16, 2026//

Listen to this article

Defendant appealed his conviction for child molestation, arguing that the trial court erred in allowing the jury to hear a portion of the victim’s forensic interview where she discussed previous, uncharged alleged acts of sexual abuse that defendant had committed against her.

Where the admitted portion of the interview was relevant to show defendant’s sexual desire for the victim and thus his motive to commit the charged act, the probative value of the evidence outweighed any resulting prejudice.

Judgment is affirmed.

State v. Matlock (MLW No. 84627/Case No. SD38693 – 7 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Growcock, J.) Appealed from circuit court, Howell County, Ray, J. (Jedd Christian Schenider, Columbia and Thomas Robert Flack, St. Charles for appellant) (Abigail Madeline Meharg, Jefferson City and Michael P. Hutchings, West Plains for respondent)

Legal Tech

See All Legal Tech News

Latest Opinion Digests

See all digests

Top stories

See more news