Criminal Law: Statutory Rape-Judgment of Acquittal
Staff Report//July 9, 2026//
Defendant appealed his convictions and sentence for statutory rape and statutory sodomy, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal because the state failed to prove that defendant touched the victim’s genitals with his hand. Defendant also argued that the trial court made a clerical error in the written judgment.
Where the victim’s testimony supported a reasonable inference that defendant had touched her genitals, there was sufficient evidence to support the statutory sodomy conviction, but the written judgment failed to reflect the offense for which defendant was convicted.
Judgment is affirmed and remanded.
State v. Sawtelle (MLW No. 84950/Case No. ED113554 – 7 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Lay, J.) Appealed from circuit court, St. Francois County, King, J. (Carol Jansen for appellant) (Alex D. Beezley for respondent)
Legal Tech
- New dedicated coverage of tech challenges facing law firms and legal departments
- Gemini Legal launches DraftEngine for civil litigation forms
- Lawyers continue to grapple with AI ethical issues
Latest Opinion Digests
- Insurance-Interpleader-Competing Claims to Insurance Proceeds
- Employer-Employee-Discrimination-Hostile Work Environment
- Criminal Law-Rape-Oral and Written Judgments
- Torts-Defamation-Official Immunity
- Real Property-Adverse Possession-Oral Agreement for Sale
- Domestic Relations-Termination of Parental Rights-Parental Unfitness
- Criminal Law-Violation of Order of Protection-Scope of Cross-Examination
Top stories
- New dedicated coverage of tech challenges facing law firms and legal departments
- Parity Act claim against insurer for child’s treatment survives motion to dismiss
- ABA opinion addresses client restrictions in engagement letters
- U.S. District Court allows plaintiffs to amend complaint alleging fraud
- AAA Insurance faces $21.5M bad faith verdict in Clay County
- Legal Limelight: Meghan S. Largent champions landowners in takings cases
- Supreme Court rejects bright-line rule on FAA worker exemption
- 2026 Unsung Legal Heroes: Publisher’s Letter, honorees





