Where an appellant challenged the dismissal of his civil-rights action, the judgment is affirmed because the district court properly found that the claims were time barred, and the appellant failed to allege sufficient facts to support a plausible claim. Judgment ...

Tagged with: civil rights Sufficient Facts Time-Barred Claims

Plaintiff appealed the district court’s order granting summary judgment to defendants, dismissing plaintiff’s claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act, and 42 U.S.C. §1983. Where the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff, entitled defendants ...

Tagged with: 42 U.S.C. §1983 Americans with Disabilities Act civil rights Rehabilitation Act

  Plaintiff sued defendants, alleging a conspiracy to revoke his medical license in violation of state law and federal civil rights law. Plaintiff appealed from the dismissal of his claims against certain defendants and grant of summary judgment to the ...

Tagged with: 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 42 U.S.C. §§ 1982 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 civil rights conspiracy Revocation of Medical License

Where a mass-transit district challenged the dismissal of its petition for review of a right-to-sue letter issued to a blind bus customer by the Missouri Commission on Human Rights, the commission did not exceed its authority in issuing the right-to-sue ...

Tagged with: civil rights judicial review MHRA Right-To-Sue Letter

Where an inmate challenged the dismissal of his failure-to-protect claim, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend the complaint because the proposed amendments added new defendants and claims, and the judgment is affirmed because ...

Tagged with: civil rights discovery Failure To Protect Inmate Action

Where civil detainees challenged a Minnesota sex-offender policy that restricted their internet and media access, arguing that the policy violated their constitutional rights including a right to be well-informed voters and seeking a preliminary injunction so that they could prepare ...

Tagged with: civil rights Minnesota Law mootness Sex-Offender Restriction

Where an inmate challenged an adverse summary judgment on his claims that jail officials were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs, the judgment is affirmed because the inmate did not show deliberate indifference. Judgment is affirmed. Shelton v. McLeod ...

Tagged with: civil rights Deliberate Indifference Inmate Action Serious Medical Needs

Where an inmate challenged an adverse judgment in his jury trial regarding the prison’s mail policy, the district court did not abuse its discretion in submitting the issues to the jury, and the judgment is affirmed because the inmate failed ...

Tagged with: civil rights Inmate Action Prison Mail Policy

Where appellant challenged an adverse grant of summary judgment against him on his claims of First and Fourth Amendment violations, the judgment is affirmed because the appellant showed no basis for reversal. Judgment is affirmed. Nibeck v. Marion Police Department ...

Tagged with: civil rights First Amendment Fourth Amendment

Where protestors challenged a city indecent-exposure ordinance as a violation of the equal-protection clause, the district court properly applied the heightened-scrutiny standard, and the judgment is affirmed because the ordinance was substantially related to its important government interests in promoting ...

Tagged with: civil rights Equal-Protection Clause Heightened-Scrutiny Standard Municipal Ordinance

Plaintiff’s businesses were searched three times by Kansas City Police Department officers. Plaintiff filed suit under 42 U.S.C. §1983, alleging Fourth and 14th Amendment violations and common-law causes of action. Defendants, officers of the KCPD, moved for summary judgment on ...

Tagged with: 42 U.S.C. §1983 civil rights Jurisdiction to Hear Appeal Qualified Immunity