Judge rules DOGE’s cuts to humanities grants were unconstitutional
A federal judge ruled that the U.S. DOGE Service did not have the authority to cancel National Endowment for the Humanities grants, which made up more than $100M in congressionally appropriated funds.
Pentagon’s limits on press access unconstitutional, federal judge rules
A federal judge on Friday blocked the Trump administration's restrictive Pentagon press access policy, which threatens journalists with being branded security risks if they seek information not authorized for public release.
U.S. appeals court blocks Trump administration from ending TPS for Haitians
A US appeals court ruled against the Trump administration's attempt to end Temporary Protected Status for over 350,000 Haitians, citing risks of violence and instability in Haiti.
SCOTUS wrap-up: terror victims can sue PLO in federal court
U.S. Supreme Court rules federal courts can exercise personal jurisdiction over the Palestine Authority and PLO in suits for civil damages brought by terror victims.
Second phase of river-flooding trial to go virtual
After more than a year and a half of postponements, the second-phase trial in a long-running dispute pitting farmers along the Missouri River against the federal government will take place […]
Justices: Psych mandate doesn’t violate 5th Amendment
Defendants who offer a diminished capacity defense cannot seek to exclude rebuttal evidence from court-ordered mental evaluations on Fifth Amendment grounds, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled.
Criminal Law: Sentencing – Confidential Recommendation – Fifth Amendment
U.S. v. Godat (MLW No. 64041/Case No. 11-3536 – 5 pages) (U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, Gruender, J.)
Civil Practice: Subject Matter Jurisdiction – Rooker-Feldman Doctrine – Issue Preclusion
Knutson v. City Of Fargo (MLW No. 60474/Case No. 08-1894 – 11 pages) (U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, Bowman, J.) Where plaintiffs who brought federal constitutional claims against a […]
You would torture, and you would break
Let’s face it. The real question is not whether you would torture, because you would. If you believed that a nuclear device was in the center of New York City […]
8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals: Criminal law
Testimony; Fifth Amendment  07-3760 United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cheryl Moten, Defendant-Appellant Appeal From: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Submitted: June 10, 2008 Filed: […]
Legal Tech
- New dedicated coverage of tech challenges facing law firms and legal departments
- Gemini Legal launches DraftEngine for civil litigation forms
- Lawyers continue to grapple with AI ethical issues
Latest Opinion Digests
- Insurance-Interpleader-Competing Claims to Insurance Proceeds
- Employer-Employee-Discrimination-Hostile Work Environment
- Criminal Law-Rape-Oral and Written Judgments
- Torts-Defamation-Official Immunity
- Real Property-Adverse Possession-Oral Agreement for Sale
- Domestic Relations-Termination of Parental Rights-Parental Unfitness
- Criminal Law-Violation of Order of Protection-Scope of Cross-Examination
Top stories
- Mother obtains six-figure settlement after rear-end crash leads to lifelong pain
- 8th Circuit affirms denial of preliminary injunction against SB 751
- New dedicated coverage of tech challenges facing law firms and legal departments
- Parity Act claim against insurer for child’s treatment survives motion to dismiss
- ABA opinion addresses client restrictions in engagement letters
- U.S. District Court allows plaintiffs to amend complaint alleging fraud
- AAA Insurance faces $21.5M bad faith verdict in Clay County
- Legal Limelight: Meghan S. Largent champions landowners in takings cases










