Criminal Law: Post-Conviction Relief-Appointment of Counsel-Indigent Defendant
CWhere a defendant who was determined to be indigent by the motion court challenged the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief without the appointment of counsel, the judgment is reversed and remanded because the appointment of counsel for indigent defendants is mandatory under Rule 29.15(e). Judgment is reversed and remanded. Clunie v. State (MLW […]
Criminal Law: Revocation of Probation-Payment of Jail Costs-Indigent Defendant
Following her release from prison on a probation violation, defendant was placed back on probation and ordered to pay “any outstanding court costs, Crime Victims Compensation Fund, intervention fees and restitution balances.” Four years later, defendant moved to retax costs, arguing she did not owe jail costs taxed to the state due to her indigent […]
Criminal Law: Indigent Defendant-Pro Se Motion-Appointment Of Counsel
Where a defendant challenged the denial of post-conviction motion without the appointment of counsel, the motion court clearly erred in denying the defendant’s request since Rule 29.15 requires the appointment of counsel when an indigent defendant files a pro se motion. Judgment is reversed and remanded. Giles v. State (MLW No. 73083/Case No. ED106555 […]
Criminal Law: Post-Conviction Relief-Indigent Defendant-Appointment of Counsel
Where a defendant challenged the dismissal of his motion for post-conviction relief arguing that Rule 24.035 required the appointment of counsel for an indigent movant, the judgment is reversed and remanded because the defendant filed his motion timely, he was indigent and the court failed to appoint counsel. Judgment is reversed and remanded. Bishop v. […]
Criminal Law: Appointment of Counsel-Indigent Defendant
Where a defendant challenged a judgment denying his pro se motion to vacate or correct the judgment or sentence, arguing that the motion court violated his rights by denying his post-conviction motion without appointing counsel and allowing the filing of an amended motion, the judgment is reversed based on the appellate court’s recent ruling in […]
Criminal Law : Post-Conviction – Withdrawal Of Counsel – Indigent Defendant
Williams v. State (MLW No. 69499/Case No. WD79001 – 11 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, Martin, J.)
Latest Opinion Digests
- Immigration: Asylum-Withholding of Removal-Appellate Jurisdiction
- Criminal Law: Child Pornography-Bottom-of-Guidelines Sentence-Substantive Reasonableness of Sentence
- Criminal Law: Child Abuse-Sufficiency Of Evidence-Closing Argument
- Civil Rights: Religious Freedom-RLUIPA-Res Judicata
- Civil Practice: Res Judicata-Stop Work Order
- Immigration: Drug Conviction-Removability-Overbreadth of State Offense
- Civil Practice: Asset Forfeiture-Sanctions
- Civil Rights: Due Process-Failure to State Claim
- Probate : Revocable Trust – Amendment – Reformation
- Employer – Employee : Unpaid Commissions – At-Will Status
- Criminal Law : Post-Conviction Relief – Effectiveness Of Counsel – Conflict Of Interest
- Appellate Practice : Jurisdiction – Final Judgment
Top stories
- Nurse entitled to disability benefits despite working months after accident, Supreme Court rules
- Eastern District rules 10 cases against TitleMax may proceed without arbitration
- Supreme Court declines to hear Republican appeals on abortion ballot initiatives
- Cole County jury awards $1.56 billion in Roundup case headed for appeal
- Jury gives massive award after fleeing suspect causes fatal crash
- 8th Circuit tosses suit claiming false sale prices
- Attorney general releases report on Kim Gardner investigation
- Legal Limelight: Jason C. Smith, Office Managing Partner, Spencer Fane