Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

AAA Insurance faces bad faith verdict in Clay County

A $21.5 million verdict was reached for the plaintiff in a bad faith claim against AAA Insurance.

The suit was reached June 12 in Clay County Circuit Court, with Judge Timothy Flook presiding over the jury trial which began June 8. Of the suit, $1 million was for compensatory damages and $20.5 million was for punitive damages. All 12 jurors signed both the underlying verdict and punitive verdict.

The suit goes back to July 4, 2021, in Eureka Springs, Arkansas. The plaintiff, Audrey Allinder, 17, was involved in a roll-over accident as the driver. The plaintiff’s good friend, Courtney Paulik, was a passenger who suffered a serious traumatic brain injury.

Paulik was forced to file suit when Allinder’s insurer, AAA, did not to make attempts to settle the claim for the $25,000 policy limits and failed to seek a release of liability to protect from potential excess judgment. The suit also claimed AAA failed to provide a timely defense, in contravention of the insurance policy, which resulted in a default judgment being entered against Allinder. After a bench trial for the damages, a $6.04 million judgment was entered against her.

Several years later, one week before the Clay County jury trial, AAA paid the full amount of the underlying judgment plus interest to Paulick, which by then was in excess of $7 million. However, the defendant continued to deny responsibility for harms caused to the plaintiff.

The plaintiff was represented by lead attorney Wes Shumate of Davis, Bethune, & Jones in Kansas City, along with Brette Hart and Matt Greenberg of Harris and Harte in Overland Park, Kansas, and Kevin Buchanan, also with Davis, Bethune, & Jones.

The defendant was represented by lead attorney Michael McCausland of McCausland, Barrett & Bartalos in Kansas City, as well as Daphne Halderman and Jordan Bergus, also with McCausland, Barrett & Bartalos.

The plaintiff expert in insurance was Ray McLaughlin of RPM Consultants out of Hendersonville, Tennessee.

The defense expert in insurance was Steven Plitt of The Cavanaugh Law Firm in Phoenix.

There was a pretrial demand of $2.3 million, which was withdrawn before trial following jury selection. There was pretrial offer of $250,000.

“I know Miss Allinder is happy to know that she was heard, and that a verdict like this, because it was a punitive verdict against the insurance company, can affect some change that will help other people, so they don’t have to go through this,” Shumate said.

Counsel for the defendant could not immediately be reached for comment.

 

Amount of verdict: $21.5 million

Type of action: Other – Insurance

Venue: Clay County Circuit Court

Case Number/Date: 22CY-CV11510/June 12, 2026

Judge: Timothy Flook

Plaintiffs’ Expert(s): Ray McLaughlin, insurance, RPM Consultants, Hendersonville, Tennessee

Defendants’ Expert(s): Steven Plitt, insurance, The Cavanaugh Law Firm, Phoenix

Injuries: Financial Harm, Emotional Distress, Psychological

Last Pretrial Demand: $2.3 million

Last Pretrial Offer: $250,000

Insurer: Auto Club Inter-Insurance Exchange

Caption: Audrey Allinder v. Auto Club Inter-Insurance Exchange (AAA)

Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: Wes Shumate, Davis, Bethune, & Jones, Kansas City; Brette Hart, Harris and Harte, Overland Park, Kansas; Matt Greenberg, Harris and Harte, Overland Park, Kansas; Kevin Buchanan, Davis, Bethune, & Jones, Kansas City

Defendants’ Attorneys: Michael McCausland, McCausland, Barrett & Bartalos, Kansas City; Daphne Halderman, McCausland, Barrett & Bartalos, Kansas City; Jordan Bergus, McCausland, Barrett & Bartalos, Kansas City

Sideswipe collision crash in Clay County ends in settlement

A $300,000 settlement was reached March 4 in a motor vehicle collision suit out of Clay County Circuit Court.

The confidential plaintiff was represented by Laurie Del Percio of The Horn Law Firm in Independence. There was no attorney for the defendant, who was also confidential.

The accident occurred Aug. 8, 2023, when the defendant made an improper lane change, sideswiping the plaintiff’s vehicle. The plaintiff declined an ambulance at the scene due to the lack of non-life-threatening injuries and planned to treat the plain with rest and over-the-counter medication.

A week after the collision — after the pain did not subside — the plaintiff visited a chiropractor. He was treated by the chiropractor for two weeks and then transferred to another chiropractor for a second opinion.

When this treatment failed to provide pain relief, the plaintiff went to pain management and received a series of injections. He continues to treat with plain management.

“Painting a picture of the plaintiff’s life before versus after the subject collision was key in reaching a successful settlement,” Del Percio stated.

She had no additional comment.

 

Motor Vehicle Collision

Amount of settlement: $300,000

Type of action: Motor vehicle collision

Venue: Clay County Circuit Court

Case Number/Date: Not filed; March 4, 2026

Judge: Not applicable

Plaintiffs’ Experts: None

Defendants’ Experts: None

Injuries: Head, brain, neck, back, spine

Special Damages: $161,471.39 in billed past medical, $98,670.78 in written-off past medical

Caption: Not filed, confidential

Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: Laurie Del Percio, The Horn Law Firm, Independence

Defendants’ Attorneys: None

Defense secures win in medical malpractice birth injury case

A nurse won her case before a jury after the child she helped deliver sued. The child was born with cerebral palsy, and her attorney and parent argued the condition was preventable.

The case stems from a labor and delivery on July 3, 2001, when the plaintiff’s mother, Heather Simmerman, gave birth to her. The lawsuit was filed in 2018 by the mother as next friend and her daughter, Alexis, was substituted as the plaintiff when she turned 18.

Both Simmermans, represented by Brennan Delaney and Summer Davidson of Langdon & Emison in Independence, claim the defendant Sonia Demisch R.N. breached the standard of care resulting in Alexis’ cerebral palsy.

“The plaintiff claimed that our client, a labor and delivery nurse, violated the co-defendant obstetrician’s oxytocin (Pitocin) order by failing to recognize uterine hyperstimulation and fetal intolerance and to discontinue Pitocin and perform intrauterine resuscitation measures,” said the defendant’s attorney John Witten. “The plaintiff alleged that those actions caused cerebral palsy resulting in speech and motor deficits and asked the jury to award more than $21 million in damages. Our defense disputed breach of the standard of care, causation and damages.”

The Simmermans also claimed the doctor, who was represented by Zachary Walker of Gausnell, O’Keefe & Thomas in St. Louis, breached the standard of care by failing to come to the hospital after being told by Demsich the patient was “complete and pushing” approximately an hour before delivery.

“On cross-examination by Plaintiff, Dr. Fitch and his OB/GYN expert testified that Nurse Demsich failed to recognize hyperstimulation and fetal intolerance on the fetal heart monitor and failed to follow the oxytocin order. Nurse Demsich presented evidence that the fetal heart rate tracing was reassuring and that it did not show hyperstimulation or fetal intolerance as those terms were commonly defined and understood in 2001,” according to Witten and his co-counsel Timothy S. Frets.

Witten said the defense disputed the causation of plaintiff’s injuries and focused on medical evidence showing she sustained a short-term or near-total anoxic injury to parts of her brain after being born with the umbilical cord wrapped around her neck.

“On damages, we challenged the methodology and conclusions of the plaintiff’s life care planner, Dr. Huckfeldt. The defense also presented testimony from a joint defense life care planner, Dr. Canter, who evaluated the plaintiff’s functional needs and offered a different assessment of the level of care required,” Witten said.

Frets and Witten said the Simmermans requested past non-economic damages of $3,000,000, future medical damages of $11,004,076, and future non-economic damages of $7,000,000 for a total of $21,004,076. They did not submit evidence of past medical damages and withdrew a claim of punitive damages against Demsich before submission to the jury.

After a nine-day trial in Clay County in February, the jury returned a verdict in favor of both defendants.

Delaney said Simmerman was one of the best clients he has ever had and that he is disappointed by the result.

“There’s some cases that need to be tried and this was one of them. We felt very confident about the standard of care issues that the nurse didn’t do what she was supposed to do in the case,” Delaney said. “We had a great client who was significantly damaged, (and had) significant brain injury as a result of the negligence we alleged. The difficulty was the causation piece of it was hard, and we knew that going in.”

Witten said one of the most challenging aspects of the case was its age.

“Another challenge was the complexity of the medical issues. We focused on breaking the science down into something the jury could easily follow,” Witten said. “Our experts explained how a short-term total or near-total anoxic event affects a different area of the brain compared to a prolonged partial hypoxic event lasting an hour or longer, which was the mechanism the plaintiff attributed to the alleged misadministration of Pitocin. One of the plaintiff’s experts used a demonstrative exhibit that color-coded the brain regions. By closing argument, our theme was that the plaintiff’s theory was simply the wrong color.”

Amount of verdict, judgment or settlement: Defense verdict

Type of action: Medical malpractice

Venue: Clay County Circuit Court

Case Number/Date: 18CY-CV06925 / 02/17/2026

Judge: David Chamberlain

Plaintiffs’ Experts: Scott Serden, M.D. (OB/GYN), Los Angeles, California; Michelle E. Francis, BSN, RNC, CEFM (Labor and Delivery) Long Beach, California; Gene Tenorio, M.D. (Pediatric Neurologist) Springfield, Missouri; Roger E. Huckfeldt, M.D. (Life Care Planner) Springfield, Missouri.

Defendants’ Experts: Michele Wright, RNC, C-EFM (Labor and Delivery Nurse) Columbia, Missouri; William Graf, M.D. (Pediatric Neurologist) New Haven, Connecticut; Joel R. Meyer, MD, FACR (Neuroradiologist) Gilbert, Arizona; Bruce Bryan, M.D. (OB/GYN), St. Louis, Missouri; Jennifer Canter, M.D. (Life Care Planner) Armonk, New York.

Injuries: Cerebral palsy resulting in speech and motor deficits.

Special Damages: Plaintiff requested past non-economic of $3,000,000, future medical damages of $11,004,076, and future non-economic damages of $7,000,000 for a total of $21,004,076. Plaintiff did not submit evidence of past medical damages.

Last Pretrial Demand: $800,000 (Demsich)

Last Pretrial Offer: $600,000 (Demsich); $16,000 (Fitch)

Caption: Alexis Simmerman v. Ronald Fitch, D.O. and Sonia Demsich, R.N

Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: Brennan Delaney & Summer Davidson of Langdon & Emison in Independence.                                                                                                                      Defendants’ Attorneys: Timothy S. Frets & John W. Witten of Rouse Frets White Goss Gentile Rhodes in Leawood, Kansas; Zachary Walker of Gausnell, O’Keefe & Thomas in St. Louis.

Clay County jury rules in mixed liability fryer burn case

A jury partially sided with the plaintiff in a personal injury case involving negligence in the workplace.

A $100,000 verdict was reached by a Clay County Circuit Court jury Nov. 5. The jury found the plaintiff 75 percent at fault. The verdict stems from a lawsuit filed by the plaintiff, Bryan Stotts, for the severe burns he suffered when hot oil spilled on him from a fryer at a Qdoba restaurant.

The plaintiff initially requested $800,000 from the jury for the injuries that occurred when a fryer that was missing a rear wheel and propped up by a pan unseen by Stotts tipped and spilled hot oil on him. Stotts was working for the Waldinger Corporation, who had been hired by defendant No. 1 Repair and Maintenance to perform service work at the Qdoba restaurant.

The plaintiff also claimed that one of the defendant’s cooks bumped into the fryer, causing it to come off the pan and spill the oil. The defendant alleged Stotts failed to check the oil temperature before working. He ultimately suffered second and third degree burns to his left arm and torso, resulting in reduced grip strength, range of motion, heat sensitivity and discomfort.

Stotts was represented by lead attorney Douglass F. Noland of the Noland Law Firm in Kansas City, along with Kate E. Noland. The defendants were represented by Corey L. Kraushaar, along with James Smart, of Brown & James in St. Louis. The case was tried before Judge Timothy Flook.

Stotts initially requested $800,000 from the jury. The jury returned a verdict for Qdoba on the negligence claim, and a plaintiff verdict for $400,000 on the premises liability claim before fault. It resulted in a net verdict of $100,00 before set-off from defendant No. 1 Repair’s settlement with the plaintiff.

Counsel had no additional comments.

 

Negligence and premises liability

Amount of verdict: $100,000

Allocation of fault: 75 percent against the plaintiff

Breakdown and distribution of total value: Plaintiff requested $800,000 from the jury. Jury verdict for defendant on the negligence claim. Jury verdict for plaintiff in the amount of $400,000 on the premises liability claim before fault. Net verdict of $100,000 before set-off from co-defendant settlement with plaintiff

Type of action: Negligence and premises liability

Venue: Clay County Circuit Court

Case Number/Date: 23CY-CV10855, 11/05/2025

Caption: Bryan K Stotts v. Qdoba Restaurant Corp. d/b/a Qdoba Mexican Eats, and Number 1 Repair and Maintenance, LLC

Injuries alleged: Dermatological (burns, cuts, other external)

Injuries detail: Second and third degree burns to plaintiff’s left arm and torso, reduced grip strength and range of motion, sensitivity to heat, discomfort

Last pretrial demand: $250,000

Last pretrial offer: $60,000

Plaintiff’s attorneys: Douglass F. Noland and Kate E. Noland of the Noland Law Firm in Kansas City

Defendant’s attorneys: Corey L. Kraushaar and James Smart of Brown & James in St. Louis

Plaintiff expert(s): Dr. Daniel D. Zimmerman, a physician in Westwood, Kansas