Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Law-Murder-Admission of Post-Arrest Silence and Jail Phone Calls

Staff Report//May 13, 2026//

Criminal Law-Murder-Admission of Post-Arrest Silence and Jail Phone Calls

Staff Report//May 13, 2026//

Listen to this article

Defendant appealed his conviction for second-degree murder and armed criminal action, challenging the trial court’s decision to permit the state to question defendant’s post-arrest silence and to admit recordings of his jail phone calls.  

Where defendant testified for the first time at trial that his deceased brother was the perpetrator, the prosecutor’s cross-examination regarding defendant’s failure to come forth with this information for years constituted a reasonable attack on defendant’s credibility rather than an impermissible refence to post-arrest silence.   

Judgment is affirmed.  

State v. Mock (MLW No. 84770/Case No. Wd87365 – 0 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, Gabbert, J.) Appealed from circuit court, Jackson County, Round, J. (Jay R. Anielak, Kansas City for appellant) (Wensdai Brooks, Jefferson City for respondent) 


Latest Opinion Digests

See all digests

Top stories

See more news