Civil Practice: Ejectment Action-Failure to Appear-Default Judgment
Staff Report//March 4, 2020//
Where appellant did not timely appear in an ejectment action and the district court entered a default judgment based on a finding that he willfully refused to appear, the court did not abuse its discretion, and the default judgment was appropriate.
Judgment is affirmed.
U.S. v. Hubbard (MLW No. 74577/Case No. 19-1924 – 2 pages) (U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, per curiam) Appealed from U.S. District Court, Northern District of Iowa.
Latest Opinion Digests
- Insurance-Interpleader-Competing Claims to Insurance Proceeds
- Employer-Employee-Discrimination-Hostile Work Environment
- Criminal Law-Rape-Oral and Written Judgments
- Torts-Defamation-Official Immunity
- Real Property-Adverse Possession-Oral Agreement for Sale
- Domestic Relations-Termination of Parental Rights-Parental Unfitness
- Criminal Law-Violation of Order of Protection-Scope of Cross-Examination
- Criminal Law-Resisting Arrest-Sufficiency of Evidence
- Criminal Law-Post-Conviction Relief-Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
- Domestic Relations-Dissolution-Property Division
- Criminal Law-Assault-Self-Defense
Top stories
- $2.1M settlement reached for five educators injured in work-trip crash
- SCOTUS News: Court rules customs agents can turn back asylum seekers
- SCOTUS News: Justices shut down Roundup failure-to-warn claims
- Missouri Supreme Court blocks St. Louis recycling lawsuit
- Nearly $100M settlement reached in wrongful death suit
- Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District elects new chief judge
- Missouri Lawyers Media honors top legal leaders with 2026 ICON Awards | Photos
- SCOTUS News: ‘State-court loser’ can’t seek relief in federal court





