Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Law-Assault-Self-Defense

Staff Report//June 24, 2026//

Criminal Law-Assault-Self-Defense

Staff Report//June 24, 2026//

Listen to this article

Defendant appealed his conviction for first-degree assault and armed criminal action, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal because the state failed to prove he did not act in self-defense. Defendant also challenged the sentence imposed by the trial court.  

Where a jury could have found that defendant lacked reasonable belief that deadly force was necessary to prevent the use of unlawful force against him, the trial court did not err in denying a judgment of acquittal.   

Judgment is affirmed.  

State v. Clemmons (MLW No. 84878/Case No. ED113421 – 11 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Navarro-McKelvey, J.) Appealed from circuit court, City of St. Louis, Ribaudo, J. (Nathan T. Swanson for appellant) (Garrick F. D. Aplin for respondent) 

 

Legal Tech

See All Legal Tech News

Latest Opinion Digests

See all digests

Top stories

See more news