Domestic Relations-Order of Protection-Sufficiency of Evidence
Staff Report//April 22, 2026//
Defendant appealed the entry of an order of protection in favor of plaintiff, arguing that the trial court erred in adjourning the initial hearing during the cross-examination of plaintiff and contending that there was insufficient evidence to prove defendant committed the predicate act of harassment.
Where defendant did not contest the adjournment of the hearing, he failed to preserve his argument, and the record contained sufficient evidence to find that defendant had harassed plaintiff, including evidence of defendant’s repeated phone calls which plaintiff testified caused her severe emotional distress.
Judgment is affirmed.
M.J.R. v. E.R (MLW No. 84645/Case No. WD87974 – 17 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, Chapman, J.) Appealed from circuit court, Clay County, O’Hara, J. (Nina McDonnell, Clayton for appellant) (Kenneth Jamison, Gladstone and Eric Sokol, Kearney for respondent)
Legal Tech
- New dedicated coverage of tech challenges facing law firms and legal departments
- Gemini Legal launches DraftEngine for civil litigation forms
- Lawyers continue to grapple with AI ethical issues
Latest Opinion Digests
- Insurance-Interpleader-Competing Claims to Insurance Proceeds
- Employer-Employee-Discrimination-Hostile Work Environment
- Criminal Law-Rape-Oral and Written Judgments
- Torts-Defamation-Official Immunity
- Real Property-Adverse Possession-Oral Agreement for Sale
- Domestic Relations-Termination of Parental Rights-Parental Unfitness
- Criminal Law-Violation of Order of Protection-Scope of Cross-Examination
Top stories
- New dedicated coverage of tech challenges facing law firms and legal departments
- Parity Act claim against insurer for child’s treatment survives motion to dismiss
- ABA opinion addresses client restrictions in engagement letters
- U.S. District Court allows plaintiffs to amend complaint alleging fraud
- AAA Insurance faces $21.5M bad faith verdict in Clay County
- Legal Limelight: Meghan S. Largent champions landowners in takings cases
- Supreme Court rejects bright-line rule on FAA worker exemption
- 2026 Unsung Legal Heroes: Publisher’s Letter, honorees





