Domestic Relations-Order of Protection-Mootness
Staff Report//July 1, 2026//
Defendant appealed the trial court’s entry of an order of protection that was designated to expire on March 12, 2026.
Where there was no evidence that the order had been extended, its apparent expiration mooted defendant’s appeal, and the deficiencies of his appellate brief also precluded appellate review.
Appeal is dismissed.
T.M.G. v. G.M. (MLW No. 85038/Case No. ED113428 – 4 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Clark, J.) Appealed from circuit court, St. Louis County, Ribaudo, J. (G.M., appellant pro se) (T.M.G., respondent pro se)
Latest Opinion Digests
- Insurance-Interpleader-Competing Claims to Insurance Proceeds
- Employer-Employee-Discrimination-Hostile Work Environment
- Criminal Law-Rape-Oral and Written Judgments
- Torts-Defamation-Official Immunity
- Real Property-Adverse Possession-Oral Agreement for Sale
- Domestic Relations-Termination of Parental Rights-Parental Unfitness
- Criminal Law-Violation of Order of Protection-Scope of Cross-Examination
- Criminal Law-Resisting Arrest-Sufficiency of Evidence
- Criminal Law-Post-Conviction Relief-Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
- Domestic Relations-Dissolution-Property Division
- Criminal Law-Assault-Self-Defense
Top stories
- Dispute over property ownership remanded to circuit court
- Missouri grill settles federal sexual harassment, retaliation suit
- Federal judge trims Westport discrimination suit, allows claims to proceed
- SCOTUS News: 4th Amendment extended to cellphone location data
- Federal court remands dispute over insurance funds to state court
- SCOTUS News: State concealed-carry restriction violates 2nd Amendment
- $2.1M settlement reached for five educators injured in work-trip crash
- SCOTUS News: Court rules customs agents can turn back asylum seekers





