Free Newsletter
Defense avoids $21M demand after client accused of stealing intellectual property
The defense wins a trade secrets lawsuit as jury rejects Sun Solar's $12M trial claim after a $21M pretrial demand and awards abuse of process damages.
Real Property : Subdivision Restrictions – Abuse Of Process – Attorney’s Fees
Trustees of Clayton Terrace Subdivision v. 6 Clayton Terrace, LLC (MLW No. 71775/Case No. ED105555 – 23 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Sullivan, J.)
Tort : Malicious Prosecution – Abuse Of Process – Probable Cause
Impey v. Clithero (MLW No. 71600/Case No. WD80991 – 15 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, Ardini Jr., J.)
Civil Practice : Abuse Of Process – Frivolous Appeal – Trespass
Snelling v. Segbers (MLW No. 69358/Case No. ED103333 – 9 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Van Amburg, J.)
Latest Opinion Digests
- Insurance-Interpleader-Competing Claims to Insurance Proceeds
- Employer-Employee-Discrimination-Hostile Work Environment
- Criminal Law-Rape-Oral and Written Judgments
- Torts-Defamation-Official Immunity
- Real Property-Adverse Possession-Oral Agreement for Sale
- Domestic Relations-Termination of Parental Rights-Parental Unfitness
- Criminal Law-Violation of Order of Protection-Scope of Cross-Examination
- Criminal Law-Resisting Arrest-Sufficiency of Evidence
- Criminal Law-Post-Conviction Relief-Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
- Domestic Relations-Dissolution-Property Division
- Criminal Law-Assault-Self-Defense
Top stories
- Defense avoids $21M demand after client accused of stealing intellectual property
- COA reverses summary judgment on discrimination claims
- Dispute over property ownership remanded to circuit court
- Missouri grill settles federal sexual harassment, retaliation suit
- Federal judge trims Westport discrimination suit, allows claims to proceed
- SCOTUS News: 4th Amendment extended to cellphone location data
- Federal court remands dispute over insurance funds to state court
- SCOTUS News: State concealed-carry restriction violates 2nd Amendment
