Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Civil Rights: First Amendment Speech-Retaliation

Staff Report//March 10, 2020//

Civil Rights: First Amendment Speech-Retaliation

Staff Report//March 10, 2020//

Listen to this article

Where a sergeant sued members of the highway patrol claiming that adverse employment actions were taken against him in for his protected , the district court properly found that the appellant failed to show a First Amendment violation, so the defendants were entitled to qualified immunity, and because the non-testimonial speech was not protected by the First Amendment, the speech could serve as a legitimate ground for an adverse employment action and the judgment is affirmed because the appellant failed to show pretext.

Judgment is affirmed.

Henry v. Johnson (MLW No. 74571/Case No. 18-3298 – 13 pages) (U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, Grasz, J.) Appealed from U.S. District Court, Western District of Missouri, Epps, J. (Jonathan Cornwall Pleban, St Louis, argued for appellant; Lynette Marie Petruska appeared on the brief) (Christopher R. Wray, Jefferson City, argued for appellee; Jordan Lisle Williams appeared on the brief).


Latest Opinion Digests

See all digests

Top stories

See more news