Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Law-Wire Fraud-Interlocutory Detention of Property-Appellate Jurisdiction

Staff Report//May 20, 2026//

Criminal Law-Wire Fraud-Interlocutory Detention of Property-Appellate Jurisdiction

Staff Report//May 20, 2026//

Listen to this article

Defendant filed an interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s order allowing the government to maintain custody of property it alleged was forfeitable as a result of defendant’s alleged offenses of wire fraud and money laundering.

Where defendant failed to show that the district court’s order granted or denied an injunction, the order did not fall within the scope of the exception to the bar on appeals of interlocutory orders, meaning the court lacked appellate jurisdiction.

Appeal is dismissed.

U.S. v. Chandran (MLW No. 84791/Case No. 25-2217 – 6 pages) (U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, Gruender, J.) Appealed from U.S. District Court, District of Nebraska, Bazis, J.  (Victoria H Buter, Omaha, NE for appellant; Thomas Harlan Dahlk, Omaha, NE on the brief) (Chelsea R. Rooney, Washington, D.C. for appellee)


Latest Opinion Digests

See all digests

Top stories

See more news