Workers’ Compensation: Permanent Total Disability-Pre-Existing Disabilities
Staff Report//December 5, 2024//
Plaintiff appealed the denial of his claim for permanent total disability benefits from the Second Injury Fund, arguing that the Industrial Relations Commission erred in considering his prior right shoulder disability in isolation from his enhanced permanent partial disability award because the disability satisfied the “direct result requirement.”
Where plaintiff’s enhanced PPD benefits from a prior work injury should have been considered in a subsequent PTD claim, the Commission erred in its denial of plaintiff’s benefits claim.
Torbitzky, J., dissenting: “The Supreme Court’s opinions in Parker and Klecka make clear that non qualifying disabilities cannot be considered in the determination of permanent total disability. As the principal opinion points out, ‘there is a legislative-directed departure from earlier precedent which had allowed consideration of all preexisting disabilities in the determination of PTD.’”
Judgment is reversed and remanded.
Ryan v. State of Missouri, Second Injury Fund (MLW No. 82409/Case No. ED112149 – 26 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Wright, J.) Appeal from Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. (Branson L. Wood III for appellant) (Kimberley C. Fournier for respondent)
Legal Tech
- New dedicated coverage of tech challenges facing law firms and legal departments
- Gemini Legal launches DraftEngine for civil litigation forms
- Lawyers continue to grapple with AI ethical issues
Latest Opinion Digests
- Insurance-Interpleader-Competing Claims to Insurance Proceeds
- Employer-Employee-Discrimination-Hostile Work Environment
- Criminal Law-Rape-Oral and Written Judgments
- Torts-Defamation-Official Immunity
- Real Property-Adverse Possession-Oral Agreement for Sale
- Domestic Relations-Termination of Parental Rights-Parental Unfitness
- Criminal Law-Violation of Order of Protection-Scope of Cross-Examination
Top stories
- 8th Circuit affirms denial of preliminary injunction against SB 751
- New dedicated coverage of tech challenges facing law firms and legal departments
- Parity Act claim against insurer for child’s treatment survives motion to dismiss
- ABA opinion addresses client restrictions in engagement letters
- U.S. District Court allows plaintiffs to amend complaint alleging fraud
- AAA Insurance faces $21.5M bad faith verdict in Clay County
- Legal Limelight: Meghan S. Largent champions landowners in takings cases
- Supreme Court rejects bright-line rule on FAA worker exemption





