Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

EVENTS

Icon Honors

June 18th, 2026 | 11:00 AM

The ICON Honors recognize distinguished men and women 60 or older who have demonstrated notable, sustained success and strong leadership wit[...]

Diversity & Inclusion

August 13th, 2026 | 12:00 AM

Recognizing attorneys, firms, organizations and legal professionals who are significantly advancing diversity, inclusion and the dignity of [...]

KC Legal Leaders

August 21st, 2026 | 12:00 AM

The Missouri Lawyers Media KC Legal Leaders event honors excellence in all areas of the Kansas City legal community.

See All Events

Judge strikes down Tump’s $100,000 H-1B visa fee

By Nate Raymond, Reuters//June 9, 2026//

A U.S. flag and a U.S. H-1B Visa application form are seen in this illustration

A U.S. flag and a U.S. H-1B Visa application form are seen in this illustration. (Dado Ruvic/Reuters illustration)

A U.S. flag and a U.S. H-1B Visa application form are seen in this illustration

A U.S. flag and a U.S. H-1B Visa application form are seen in this illustration. (Dado Ruvic/Reuters illustration)

Judge strikes down Tump’s $100,000 H-1B visa fee

By Nate Raymond, Reuters//June 9, 2026//

Listen to this article
Summary
  • U.S. District Judge Leo Sorokin issues ruling in Boston
  • Fee deemed an unauthorized tax, not a penalty
  • 20 Democratic state attorneys general filed the lawsuit
  • plans to appeal the decision

A on Monday struck down a $100,000 fee U.S. President Donald Trump imposed on new for highly skilled foreign workers, concluding that it constituted an unlawful tax Congress never authorized.

U.S. District Judge Leo Sorokin in Boston issued the ruling in a lawsuit filed by 20 Democratic state attorneys general challenging a fee Trump announced in September that dramatically raised the cost of obtaining H-1B visas, which tech companies in particular rely heavily on to bring on foreign workers.

The administration argued the fee constituted a lawful monetary penalty that the president was authorized to impose under federal , which gives him the power to restrict the entry of certain foreign nationals when he deems it “detrimental to the interests of the United States.”

But Sorokin concluded that the fee was not a penalty but a tax that the Republican president lacked any authorization from Congress to issue and that the and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services could not implement.

“Here, the substance and application of the $100,000 payment reveal that it is a tax, regardless of what the payment is called,” wrote Sorokin, who was appointed by Democratic President Barack Obama.

The judge cited the U.S. Supreme Court’s February ruling striking down Trump’s sweeping tariffs he pursued under a law meant for use in national emergencies. Under the logic of the justices’ decision in that case, Trump similarly had no authority under immigration law to levy a tax, Sorokin said.

White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers in a statement said the Trump administration is confident Sorokin’s order will be reversed on appeal.

“President Trump has clear legal authority to restrict entry of any class of aliens he determines is not in America’s best interests, and that is exactly what he did,” she said.

The H-1B program offers 65,000 visas annually, with another 20,000 visas for workers with advanced degrees, approved for three to six years. Employers seeking a visa for a foreign worker before Trump’s proclamation typically paid about $2,000 to $5,000 in fees depending on various factors.

Trump, in imposing the hefty new fee, in a proclamation said the H-1B program “has been deliberately exploited to replace, rather than supplement, American workers with lower-paid, lower-skilled labor.”

The fee does not apply to visas granted to foreign citizens already in the United States on student visas, who generally make up a large share of new H-1B recipients.

Few employers have paid Trump’s fee since it was instituted. As of February 15, USCIS had received just 85 payments of the $100,000 fee, an agency official said in a March filing.

The Trump administration has also ordered enhanced vetting of H-1B applicants and proposed a new visa selection process that would favor higher-skilled and better-paid workers.

The $100,000 fee prompted at least three different lawsuits challenging its implementation, including a case by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which is appealing a December decision by a judge in Washington, D.C., who rejected its claims that Trump had no authority to set the fee.

Rob Bonta, a Democrat who led the multi-state coalition that filed the case before Sorokin, hailed his ruling for striking down Trump’s “unlawful and costly $100,000 tax.”

“This tax was an attack on America’s ability to attract and retain the high-skilled talent that strengthens our economy and helps us meet critical workforce needs,” he said.


Latest Opinion Digests

See all digests

Top stories

See more news