Criminal Law: Rape-Exclusion of Prior Victim Allegations
Staff Report//July 9, 2026//
Defendant appealed his convictions for second-degree rape, arguing that the trial court erred in excluding evidence of the victim’s prior rape allegation.
Where defendant failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the victim’s prior allegation was false, it was inadmissible to challenge her credibility to show that she had a motive to fabricate her allegations against defendant. Furthermore, the lack of connection between the allegations meant there was no exception to the rape shield law.
Judgment is affirmed.
State v. Wooten (MLW No. 84943/Case No. ED113976 – 19 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Gaertner, J.) Appealed from circuit court, St. Louis County, Ribaudo, J. (Matthew G. Mueller for appellant) (Catherine L. Hanaway and Riley A. O’Shaughnessy for respondent)
Latest Opinion Digests
- Insurance-Interpleader-Competing Claims to Insurance Proceeds
- Employer-Employee-Discrimination-Hostile Work Environment
- Criminal Law-Rape-Oral and Written Judgments
- Torts-Defamation-Official Immunity
- Real Property-Adverse Possession-Oral Agreement for Sale
- Domestic Relations-Termination of Parental Rights-Parental Unfitness
- Criminal Law-Violation of Order of Protection-Scope of Cross-Examination
- Criminal Law-Resisting Arrest-Sufficiency of Evidence
- Criminal Law-Post-Conviction Relief-Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
- Domestic Relations-Dissolution-Property Division
- Criminal Law-Assault-Self-Defense
Top stories
- Supreme Court rejects bright-line rule on FAA worker exemption
- 2026 Unsung Legal Heroes: Publisher’s Letter, honorees
- Driver in accident settles negligence suit with other motorist
- Verdicts may fuel Missouri social media claims
- Judge Anthony Rex Gabbert retiring after 32 years
- Severe motorcycle crash nets seven-figure settlement
- Defense avoids $21M demand after client accused of stealing intellectual property
- COA reverses summary judgment on discrimination claims





