Judge finds 2024 phone searches of Palestinian American unconstitutional
By Kanishka Singh, Reuters//July 17, 2026//
A federal judge has ruled the U.S. government violated the constitutional rights of Palestinian American Osama Abu Irshaid when customs agents seized and searched his cell phone on two occasions at a U.S. international airport in 2024.
Here are details:
• In the ruling filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, U.S. District Judge Michael Nachmanoff wrote that Irshaid’s phone searches in 2024 violated his Fourth Amendment rights of protection from unreasonable government searches and seizures.
• Irshaid is the executive director of an organization named American Muslims for Palestine and a U.S. citizen of Palestinian descent.
• The Council on American-Islamic Relations, which had sued on Irshaid’s behalf two years ago, welcomed the ruling on Thursday.
• CAIR had alleged in the lawsuit that the federal government had placed the Palestinian American on a watch list that the Muslim advocacy group called discriminatory and racist.
• CAIR said that twice in 2024, U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents seized and conducted “advanced” searches of Irshaid’s cell phone when he returned to the U.S. from abroad.
• The government said at the time it did not add people to any such list based on race, religion and free speech activity.
• The Department of Homeland Security, of which CBP is a part, did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the ruling.
• Rights advocates have in recent years raised concerns about scrutiny against Americans of Middle Eastern descent and Arab and Palestinian backgrounds over their political views since the start of Israel’s assault on Gaza following an October 2023 Hamas attack.
Related Articles
Legal Tech
- New dedicated coverage of tech challenges facing law firms and legal departments
- Gemini Legal launches DraftEngine for civil litigation forms
- Lawyers continue to grapple with AI ethical issues
Latest Opinion Digests
- Insurance-Interpleader-Competing Claims to Insurance Proceeds
- Employer-Employee-Discrimination-Hostile Work Environment
- Criminal Law-Rape-Oral and Written Judgments
- Torts-Defamation-Official Immunity
- Real Property-Adverse Possession-Oral Agreement for Sale
- Domestic Relations-Termination of Parental Rights-Parental Unfitness
- Criminal Law-Violation of Order of Protection-Scope of Cross-Examination
Top stories
- Mother obtains six-figure settlement after rear-end crash leads to lifelong pain
- 8th Circuit affirms denial of preliminary injunction against SB 751
- New dedicated coverage of tech challenges facing law firms and legal departments
- Parity Act claim against insurer for child’s treatment survives motion to dismiss
- ABA opinion addresses client restrictions in engagement letters
- U.S. District Court allows plaintiffs to amend complaint alleging fraud
- AAA Insurance faces $21.5M bad faith verdict in Clay County
- Legal Limelight: Meghan S. Largent champions landowners in takings cases





