Public access to Case.net expanding next year
Staff Report//July 6, 2022//
The Missouri Supreme Court has approved rule changes paving the way for access to public court records from personal electronic devices starting next year.
The rule changes will not go into effect until July 1, 2023, in part so that attorneys, court staff and parties to keep unnecessary confidential information out of otherwise public documents.
The redaction requirement is not new, but the court said increased public access underscores the need for diligence and care in carrying out that responsibility.
Chief Justice Paul C. Wilson said the Court Automation Committee has been working toward this goal for years.
“Today’s orders will ensure court documents that are currently open to the public will be truly accessible to the public,” he said. “These improvements will fundamentally change the way individuals access public court documents, while balancing the need to protect confidential information and ensure the overall security and reliability of our underlying case management system.”
The expanded access will be available through Case.net and applies only for documents filed on or after July 1, 2023. Documents filed before that date will continue to be available at public access terminals in state courthouses.
Legal Tech
- New dedicated coverage of tech challenges facing law firms and legal departments
- Gemini Legal launches DraftEngine for civil litigation forms
- Lawyers continue to grapple with AI ethical issues
Latest Opinion Digests
- Insurance-Interpleader-Competing Claims to Insurance Proceeds
- Employer-Employee-Discrimination-Hostile Work Environment
- Criminal Law-Rape-Oral and Written Judgments
- Torts-Defamation-Official Immunity
- Real Property-Adverse Possession-Oral Agreement for Sale
- Domestic Relations-Termination of Parental Rights-Parental Unfitness
- Criminal Law-Violation of Order of Protection-Scope of Cross-Examination
Top stories
- Mother obtains six-figure settlement after rear-end crash leads to lifelong pain
- 8th Circuit affirms denial of preliminary injunction against SB 751
- New dedicated coverage of tech challenges facing law firms and legal departments
- Parity Act claim against insurer for child’s treatment survives motion to dismiss
- ABA opinion addresses client restrictions in engagement letters
- U.S. District Court allows plaintiffs to amend complaint alleging fraud
- AAA Insurance faces $21.5M bad faith verdict in Clay County
- Legal Limelight: Meghan S. Largent champions landowners in takings cases





