Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Law – DUI – References to Post-Arrest Silence

Staff Report//March 19, 2025//

Criminal Law – DUI – References to Post-Arrest Silence

Staff Report//March 19, 2025//

Listen to this article

Defendant appealed his conviction for DUI as a habitual offender, arguing that the trial court erred in failing to sua sponte declare a mistrial after the prosecution made references to defendant’s post-arrest silence. Defendant also challenged the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction.

Where the use of post-arrest, pre-Miranda silence as evidence of guilt was a question of unsettled law, the court declined to conduct plain error review.

Judgment is affirmed.

State v. Mefford (MLW No. 82878/Case No. WD86719 –12 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, Martin, J.) Appealed from circuit court, Dekalb County, Horsman, J. (Travis Noble Jr., Clayton for appellant) (Daniel McPherson, Jefferson City for respondent)

Latest Opinion Digests

See all digests

Top stories

See more news