Real Property-Securitization of Mortgages-Fee Limitations of Missouri Second Mortgage Loans Act
Staff Report//August 13, 2025//
Plaintiffs appealed the grant of summary judgment to defendant, which argued that the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction. Plaintiffs obtained second mortgage loans, which were later sold by the original lender to another party who pooled and securitized the loans with mortgages from other states. The loans were placed into Delaware statutory trusts, with defendant serving as indentured trustee. Plaintiffs’ complaint alleged that defendant and other parties violated the Missouri Second Mortgage Loans Act by charging or receiving excessive loan origination fees. The trial court granted summary judgment for defendant, ruling that there was no evidence that it engaged in any enumerated act under the long-arm statute.
Where defendant did not transact business in Missouri or possess Missouri real estate and there was no agency relationship with the servicer of plaintiffs’ mortgage loans, the trial court correctly determined that it lacked personal jurisdiction over defendant.
Judgment is affirmed.
Cox v. The Bank of New York Mellon (MLW No. 83645/Case No. WD87512 – 24 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, Sutton, J.) Appealed from circuit court, Clay County, Chamberlain, J. (Kip Richards, Kansas City; R. Frederick Walters, Kansas City; J. Michael Vaughan, Kansas City; and David Skeens, Kansas City for appellants) (Michael Abrams, Kansas City; Carrie Josserand, Kansas City; and James Layton, St. Louis for respondent)
Legal Tech
- New dedicated coverage of tech challenges facing law firms and legal departments
- Gemini Legal launches DraftEngine for civil litigation forms
- Lawyers continue to grapple with AI ethical issues
Latest Opinion Digests
- Insurance-Interpleader-Competing Claims to Insurance Proceeds
- Employer-Employee-Discrimination-Hostile Work Environment
- Criminal Law-Rape-Oral and Written Judgments
- Torts-Defamation-Official Immunity
- Real Property-Adverse Possession-Oral Agreement for Sale
- Domestic Relations-Termination of Parental Rights-Parental Unfitness
- Criminal Law-Violation of Order of Protection-Scope of Cross-Examination
Top stories
- Mother obtains six-figure settlement after rear-end crash leads to lifelong pain
- 8th Circuit affirms denial of preliminary injunction against SB 751
- New dedicated coverage of tech challenges facing law firms and legal departments
- Parity Act claim against insurer for child’s treatment survives motion to dismiss
- ABA opinion addresses client restrictions in engagement letters
- U.S. District Court allows plaintiffs to amend complaint alleging fraud
- AAA Insurance faces $21.5M bad faith verdict in Clay County
- Legal Limelight: Meghan S. Largent champions landowners in takings cases





