Grow facility liable after contractor injured by marijuana dust
Erin Achenbach//January 28, 2026//
Summary:
- St. Louis City jury found marijuana grow facility primarily at fault.
- Contractor suffered pulmonary distress and heart attack after dust exposure.
- Jury apportioned fault between facility and injured worker.
- Verdict stemmed from unsafe conditions at cannabis grow operation.
A $2.55 million verdict was reached for the plaintiffs in a premises liability suit filed in St. Louis City Circuit Court.
$2.5 million was awarded to plaintiff Mark Avent, and $500,000 was awarded to his wife, Lisa Avent, for health issues that were incurred after inhaling marijuana dust.
The plaintiffs were represented by William Meehan of the Meehan Law Firm in St. Louis. The defendant, Blue Arrow Missouri, was represented by David Simmons of UBGreensfelder in St. Louis. The suit was filed in December 2022, and the verdict was reached Nov. 20, 2025.
Mark Avent was working as an independent contractor for the defendant’s marijuana grow facility. According to the suit, the defendant’s employee negligently released marijuana dust into the lab air space where the plaintiff was working. The plaintiff subsequently suffered pulmonary distress, which triggered an NSTEM heart attack. He requires future medical care for atrial fibrillation, and developed PTSD after the event, never returning to work.
Blue Arrow was found 85 percent at fault, while Avent was found 15 percent at fault.
The plaintiffs’ side had two experts: Dr. Stephen Schuman, a cardiologist; and vocational specialist Jim Israel. The defense also had two experts testify: Dr. Zia Ahmad, a cardiologist; and vocational rehabilitation expert Ed Steffan.
There was one pretrial demand for $3.2 million.
“Both the clients and I were very, very gratified by the verdict. The jury was with us the whole way and realized this was a serious injury,” Meehan said. “They were very accurate in their assessment of the damages.”
Counsel for the defense could not be reached for comment.
RELATED: Click to search for and submit your Verdicts & Settlements
Premises Liability
Total value: $2.55 million
Breakdown and distribution of Total Value: $2.5 million for plaintiff Mark Avent and $500,000 for plaintiff Lisa Avent
Type of action: Premises Liability
Venue: St. Louis City Circuit Court
Case Number/Date: 2222-CC10104, 11/20/2025
Caption: Mark and Lisa Avent v. Blue Arrow of Missouri LLC
Injuries alleged: Other
Injuries Detail: Plaintiff suffered a NSTEM myocardial infarct as a result of severe pulmonary arrest; developed atrial fibrillation after attack; suffered from severe PTSD
Special Damages: Loss wages, hospital bills, future medical care; actual bills were entered into evidence
Pretrial Demand: $3.2 million
Plaintiff Attorney(s): William Meehan of the Meehan Law Firm in St. Louis
Defendant Attorney(s): David Simmons of UBGreensfelder in St. Louis
Plaintiff Expert(s): Dr. Stephen Schuman, a cardiologist; and vocational specialist Jim Israel
Defendant Expert(s): Cardiologist Dr. Zia Ahmad and vocational rehabilitation expert Ed Steffan
Insurance Carrier(s): None, coverage was denied
Related Articles
Latest Opinion Digests
- Insurance-Interpleader-Competing Claims to Insurance Proceeds
- Employer-Employee-Discrimination-Hostile Work Environment
- Criminal Law-Rape-Oral and Written Judgments
- Torts-Defamation-Official Immunity
- Real Property-Adverse Possession-Oral Agreement for Sale
- Domestic Relations-Termination of Parental Rights-Parental Unfitness
- Criminal Law-Violation of Order of Protection-Scope of Cross-Examination
- Criminal Law-Resisting Arrest-Sufficiency of Evidence
- Criminal Law-Post-Conviction Relief-Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
- Domestic Relations-Dissolution-Property Division
- Criminal Law-Assault-Self-Defense
Top stories
- ABA opinion addresses client restrictions in engagement letters
- U.S. District Court allows plaintiffs to amend complaint alleging fraud
- AAA Insurance faces $21.5M bad faith verdict in Clay County
- Legal Limelight: Meghan S. Largent champions landowners in takings cases
- Supreme Court rejects bright-line rule on FAA worker exemption
- 2026 Unsung Legal Heroes: Publisher’s Letter, honorees
- Driver in accident settles negligence suit with other motorist
- Verdicts may fuel Missouri social media claims





