Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Immigration: Removal-Exceptional Hardship-Motion to Reopen and Remand

Staff Report//June 17, 2026//

Immigration: Removal-Exceptional Hardship-Motion to Reopen and Remand

Staff Report//June 17, 2026//

Listen to this article

Petitioner sought review of the BIA’s order denying his motion to reopen and remand removal proceedings. Petitioner unsuccessfully sought cancellation of removal based on alleged exceptional hardship to qualifying relatives. After petitioner got married, he moved to reopen and remand proceedings based on new facts. The BIA concluded that the evidence was insufficient to prove that his wife and children would suffer an exceptional hardship from his removal.

Where the evidence showed that any hardship petitioner’s family would experience would not be beyond that normally experienced by family members following deportation, there was no error in denying the motion.

Petition is denied.

Ramirez Cruz v. Blanche (MLW No. 84925/Case No. 25-1062 – 5 pages) (U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, per curiam) Petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.


Latest Opinion Digests

See all digests

Top stories

See more news