Domestic Relations: Child Custody-Emergency Protective Custody-Untimely Hearing
Staff Report//September 18, 2019//
Plaintiff alleged that, two days after completing five days in jail, defendants petitioned the state juvenile court to maintain the protective custody they had over plaintiff’s children. Plaintiff alleged that defendants failed to afford her a hearing on the protective custody within the time mandated by state law and unlawfully seized her children due to a lack of reasonable suspicion of abuse or neglect. The district court dismissed plaintiff’s claim as moot and ruled that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine barred plaintiff’s claims.
Where delays in plaintiff’s protective custody hearing was not traceable to defendants’ actions, when defendants timely swore out affidavits after removing the children, plaintiff’s claim failed.
Judgment is affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part.
Webb v. Smith (MLW No. 73854/Case No. 18-2541 – 12 pages) (U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, Arnold, J.) Appealed from U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas (Lucien Ramseur Gillham, of Benton, AR for appellant; Luther O’Neal Sutter, of Benton, AR on brief) (Robert Thomas James, AAG, of Little Rock, AR for appellee; Maryna O. Jackson, AAG, of Little Rock, AR on brief)
Legal Tech
- New dedicated coverage of tech challenges facing law firms and legal departments
- Gemini Legal launches DraftEngine for civil litigation forms
- Lawyers continue to grapple with AI ethical issues
Latest Opinion Digests
- Insurance-Interpleader-Competing Claims to Insurance Proceeds
- Employer-Employee-Discrimination-Hostile Work Environment
- Criminal Law-Rape-Oral and Written Judgments
- Torts-Defamation-Official Immunity
- Real Property-Adverse Possession-Oral Agreement for Sale
- Domestic Relations-Termination of Parental Rights-Parental Unfitness
- Criminal Law-Violation of Order of Protection-Scope of Cross-Examination
Top stories
- Mother obtains six-figure settlement after rear-end crash leads to lifelong pain
- 8th Circuit affirms denial of preliminary injunction against SB 751
- New dedicated coverage of tech challenges facing law firms and legal departments
- Parity Act claim against insurer for child’s treatment survives motion to dismiss
- ABA opinion addresses client restrictions in engagement letters
- U.S. District Court allows plaintiffs to amend complaint alleging fraud
- AAA Insurance faces $21.5M bad faith verdict in Clay County
- Legal Limelight: Meghan S. Largent champions landowners in takings cases





