Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Negligence: FRSA-Retaliation-Jury Instructions

Staff Report//September 18, 2019//

Negligence: FRSA-Retaliation-Jury Instructions

Staff Report//September 18, 2019//

Listen to this article

Where a plaintiff who suffered an eye injury while working for his railway employer challenged an adverse verdict on claims brought under the Federal Railroad Safety Act, the misstated the “honestly held belief” defense in the context of the act’s contributing-factor standard and misallocated the burden of proof, and the composite error was prejudicial, so the judgment is reversed.

Judgment is reversed.

Blackorby v. BNSF Railway Company (MLW No. 73833/Case No. 18-2372 – 12 pages) (U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, Melloy, J.) Appealed from U.S. District Court, Western District of Missouri, Bough, J. (Jeff R. Dingwall, San Diego, argued for appellant) (Bryan P Neal, Dallas, argued for appellee).

Legal Tech

See All Legal Tech News

Latest Opinion Digests

See all digests

Top stories

See more news