Free Newsletter
Contracts: Construction Contract-Architect Lien-Enforcement
Staff Report//September 23, 2019//
Where an architectural firm challenged the denial of its claim for enforcement of its architect lien in a dispute arising from a contract for design services for a senior care facility, the trial court did not err in denying the claim for lien enforcement because the firm did not file its lien within the time prescribed by statute, so no lien attached to the property.
Judgment is affirmed.
Bates & Associates Inc. v. Providence Bank & Vision Ventures LLC (MLW No. 73947/Case No. ED106955/ED107279 – 11 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Ransom, J. (Michael D. Textor and Emily E. Cantwell for appellant) (Jonathan C. Browning and Daniel S. Peters for respondent).
Legal Tech
- How ransomware tactics against law firms are changing
- How large language models are leveling the personal injury playing field
- Attorney Share, Lawmatics integrate to automate law firm referrals
Latest Opinion Digests
- Criminal Law-Second-Degree Rape-Sufficiency of Evidence
- Criminal Law-Witness Tampering-Sufficiency of Evidence
- Criminal Law-Post-Conviction Relief-Abandonment by Counsel
- Criminal Law-Filing Criminal Charges-Attorney General Aid
- Criminal Law-Civil Commitment-Sexually Violent Predator
- Criminal Law-Assault-Prosecutorial Misconduct
- Real Property-Prescriptive Easement-Public Right of Way
Top stories
- 8th Circuit reverses shoreline use permit revocation
- Missouri Bar committee seeks input on rural legal service gaps
- Appeals court orders new look at conversion therapy case following Supreme Court ruling
- Jury finds seat belt maker liable in $40.5M child injury case
- Injured motorist recovers policy limits, plus medical damages in under a year
- Mother obtains six-figure settlement after rear-end crash leads to lifelong pain
- 8th Circuit affirms denial of preliminary injunction against SB 751
- New dedicated coverage of tech challenges facing law firms and legal departments
