Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Law: Wire Fraud – Sufficiency Of Evidence – Sentencing

Stephanie Maniscalco//July 13, 2009//

Criminal Law: Wire Fraud – Sufficiency Of Evidence – Sentencing

Stephanie Maniscalco//July 13, 2009//

Listen to this article

U.S. v. Anderson (MLW No.59288/Case No. 08-3402/3436 – 13 pages) (U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, Gruender, J.)

Where the government showed that a defendant in a case used an online banking system to transfer money to his account and that he initiated the transfer of loan proceeds from a Minnesota bank branch to his North Dakota account, interstate wire transfers were reasonably foreseeable to the defendant and the evidence was sufficient for his conviction for wire fraud as well as for failure to appear, and the court also did not commit significant procedural error in the defendant.
Judgment is affirmed.

U.S. v. Anderson (MLW No.59288/Case No. 08-3402/3436 – 13 pages) (U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, Gruender, J.) Appealed from U.S. District Court, District of North Dakota, Erickson, J. (Alexander F. Reichert, Grand Forks, N.D., argued for appellant) (Jennifer Klemetsrud Puhl, Fargo, N.D., argued for appellee).

Click here to read the full text of this opinion.

Latest Opinion Digests

See all digests

Legal Tech

See All Legal Tech News

Top stories

See more news