States sue DHS over FEMA election funding conditions
By Luc Cohen, Reuters//July 24, 2026//
Summary
- 25 states and the District of Columbia sued DHS over new FEMA grant conditions tied to election administration.
- DHS plans to withhold 20% of certain FEMA grants unless states adopt specified election security measures.
- The lawsuit argues the U.S. Constitution gives states—not DHS or FEMA—authority over election administration.
- More than $1 billion in FEMA grant funding is affected by the disputed policy.
A coalition of mostly Democratic-led states asked a federal judge on Thursday to block the Department of Homeland Security from withholding certain disaster-related funds until states adopt election administration practices favored by Republican President Donald Trump’s administration.
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Rhode Island by 25 states and the District of Columbia, marks the latest legal battle over voting procedures ahead of November’s midterm elections, with Trump’s party locked in a tight battle to retain control of Congress.
DHS announced on July 10 that it would withhold 20% of Federal Emergency Management Agency grant awards meant to help states prepare for potential terrorist attacks and other threats until those states submit plans to use equipment that accepts hand-marked paper ballots rather than electronic voting systems that use bar codes and QR codes to count votes.
The restrictions involve more than $1 billion in grant money.
DHS said states also would have to manually audit at least 5% of ballots cast, reconcile the number of voters who participated in each federal election with the number of votes cast and compare their voter rolls to a DHS database to make sure no non-U.S. citizens were improperly registered to vote.
States administer elections
In their lawsuit, the states — led by Rhode Island, California, Illinois and New Jersey — said the administration’s plans to condition the funds on election changes exceeded the federal government’s authority. The U.S. Constitution assigns states the role of administering federal elections.
“Congress never gave DHS or FEMA authority to rewrite state election law,” the lawsuit complaint read.
The states said they were allocated more than $740 million in the 2026 fiscal year, meaning DHS would withhold at least $148 million under the disputed policy. The grant programs have existed for years, and none of them were designed with election security specifically in mind, the lawsuit said.
In a statement, a FEMA spokesperson said the new requirements would preserve election integrity.
“We fully expected these left-wing politicians to oppose common-sense measures designed to protect election security,” the spokesperson said.
Trump and his allies have made false claims about widespread voting fraud in U.S. elections including the 2020 presidential election that he lost. Democrats and voting rights advocates say Trump is seeking to undermine public confidence in election administration and lay the groundwork for challenging the results of the midterms should Republicans lose control of either the House of Representatives or the Senate.
The administration has said states are not doing enough to prevent voter fraud and voting by non-U.S. citizens, and has sought to bolster federal control over elections.
New Jersey voting
The Democratic governor of New Jersey said on Tuesday that more than 6,000 non-U.S. citizens were accidentally registered to vote in the state and nearly 400 cast ballots, prompting demands from the Justice Department for data on these voters.
Independent studies and audits have found voter fraud to be rare. A Reuters analysis of federal court data published on Sunday undercut Trump’s assertion that a conspiracy of non-U.S. citizen voting is afoot in America, finding that many criminal cases involving such voting have stemmed from voter confusion, miscommunication with election officials or administrative errors.
Related Articles
Legal Tech
- How ransomware tactics against law firms are changing
- How large language models are leveling the personal injury playing field
- Attorney Share, Lawmatics integrate to automate law firm referrals
Latest Opinion Digests
- Criminal Law-Second-Degree Rape-Sufficiency of Evidence
- Criminal Law-Witness Tampering-Sufficiency of Evidence
- Criminal Law-Post-Conviction Relief-Abandonment by Counsel
- Criminal Law-Filing Criminal Charges-Attorney General Aid
- Criminal Law-Civil Commitment-Sexually Violent Predator
- Criminal Law-Assault-Prosecutorial Misconduct
- Real Property-Prescriptive Easement-Public Right of Way
Top stories
- 8th Circuit reverses shoreline use permit revocation
- Missouri Bar committee seeks input on rural legal service gaps
- Appeals court orders new look at conversion therapy case following Supreme Court ruling
- Jury finds seat belt maker liable in $40.5M child injury case
- Injured motorist recovers policy limits, plus medical damages in under a year
- Mother obtains six-figure settlement after rear-end crash leads to lifelong pain
- 8th Circuit affirms denial of preliminary injunction against SB 751
- New dedicated coverage of tech challenges facing law firms and legal departments





