Criminal Law: Making False Statements in Acquisition of Firearm-Procedural Errors-Substantive Reasonableness of Sentence
Staff Report//July 30, 2026//
Defendant challenged the procedural and substantive reasonableness of the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to making false statements in the acquisition of a firearm.
Where defendant did not identify any factually erroneous finding relied upon by the district court and where it did not abuse its discretion in heavily weighing the fact that defendant was distributing firearms without a license, the court affirmed defendant’s sentence.
Judgment is affirmed.
U.S. v. Berry (MLW No. 85159/Case No. 25-2674 – 6 pages) (U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, Shepherd, J.) Appealed from U.S. District Court, Western District of Arkansas, Brooks, J. (Christopher Aaron Holt, AFPD, Fayetteville, AR and Kevin Lammers, AFPD, Fayetteville, AR for appellant) (Kevin Charles Eaton, AUSA, Fort Smith, AR for appellee)
Latest Opinion Digests
- Criminal Law-Second-Degree Rape-Sufficiency of Evidence
- Criminal Law-Witness Tampering-Sufficiency of Evidence
- Criminal Law-Post-Conviction Relief-Abandonment by Counsel
- Criminal Law-Filing Criminal Charges-Attorney General Aid
- Criminal Law-Civil Commitment-Sexually Violent Predator
- Criminal Law-Assault-Prosecutorial Misconduct
- Real Property-Prescriptive Easement-Public Right of Way
Legal Tech
- AI in practice: How new technology is affecting litigation practice
- Experts foresee legal malpractice risk for those who eschew AI
- Legal Decoder launches AI-powered billing analytics interface
Top stories
- Missouri’s Kathy Lloyd named COSCA president
- BAMSL hires assistant executive director for Bar Foundation
- 8th Circuit dismisses Liberty Mutual appeal over remand order in Missouri
- Elderly couple injured in collision settles with insurer
- 8th Circuit rejects tribal school funding appeal
- 8th Circuit reverses shoreline use permit revocation
- Missouri Bar committee seeks input on rural legal service gaps
- Appeals court orders new look at conversion therapy case following Supreme Court ruling





