Convicted sniper Muhammad rejected by U.S. high court
Bloomberg News//November 10, 2009//
Convicted sniper John Allen Muhammad lost a U.S. Supreme Court bid to stop his execution, scheduled for today in Virginia, for one of 10 killings that terrorized the Washington, D.C., area over three weeks in 2002.
Muhammad was convicted of killing Dean Harold Meyers, 53, in Manassas, Va., in October 2002 while Meyers was filling his car at a gas station. He is scheduled to die by lethal injection.
Muhammad, a U.S. Army veteran, and accomplice Lee Boyd Malvo were accused of carrying out the killing spree in October 2002. They were also suspects in shootings in Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana and Washington state.
Muhammad was 41 at the time of the shootings, and Malvo was 17. Malvo received a life prison sentence on his conviction in Virginia of killing a woman outside a Virginia shopping center.
The Supreme Court rejected Muhammad’s application to block his execution without dissent, although Justices John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor issued a statement criticizing the court’s procedures for handling stay applications in death penalty cases.
The high court was scheduled to review Muhammad’s appeal in a private conference on Nov. 24, said the three justices, who lamented the “perversity of executing inmates before their appeals process has been fully concluded.”
Legal Tech
- How ransomware tactics against law firms are changing
- How large language models are leveling the personal injury playing field
- Attorney Share, Lawmatics integrate to automate law firm referrals
Latest Opinion Digests
- Criminal Law-Second-Degree Rape-Sufficiency of Evidence
- Criminal Law-Witness Tampering-Sufficiency of Evidence
- Criminal Law-Post-Conviction Relief-Abandonment by Counsel
- Criminal Law-Filing Criminal Charges-Attorney General Aid
- Criminal Law-Civil Commitment-Sexually Violent Predator
- Criminal Law-Assault-Prosecutorial Misconduct
- Real Property-Prescriptive Easement-Public Right of Way
Top stories
- 8th Circuit reverses shoreline use permit revocation
- Missouri Bar committee seeks input on rural legal service gaps
- Appeals court orders new look at conversion therapy case following Supreme Court ruling
- Jury finds seat belt maker liable in $40.5M child injury case
- Injured motorist recovers policy limits, plus medical damages in under a year
- Mother obtains six-figure settlement after rear-end crash leads to lifelong pain
- 8th Circuit affirms denial of preliminary injunction against SB 751
- New dedicated coverage of tech challenges facing law firms and legal departments





