Criminal Law : Statutory Sodomy – Child Molestation – Sufficiency Of Evidence
Stephanie Maniscalco//June 19, 2014//
Where a defendant who was convicted of statutory sodomy in the first degree argued that a trial court should have given an instruction on child molestation, the court’s instruction was appropriate because the evidence was not sufficient to conclude that the incident happened before August 28, 2000 when the conduct would have been child molestation and during the time period when the incident was proven to have occurred, the conduct constituted first-degree statutory sodomy.
Judgment is affirmed.
State v. Huffman (MLW No. 66533/Case No. ED100189 – 8 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Dowd Jr., J.) Appealed from circuit court, St. Louis City, David, J. (Amy E. Lowe for appellant) (Karen L. Kramer for respondent).
Legal Tech
- How ransomware tactics against law firms are changing
- How large language models are leveling the personal injury playing field
- Attorney Share, Lawmatics integrate to automate law firm referrals
Latest Opinion Digests
- Criminal Law-Second-Degree Rape-Sufficiency of Evidence
- Criminal Law-Witness Tampering-Sufficiency of Evidence
- Criminal Law-Post-Conviction Relief-Abandonment by Counsel
- Criminal Law-Filing Criminal Charges-Attorney General Aid
- Criminal Law-Civil Commitment-Sexually Violent Predator
- Criminal Law-Assault-Prosecutorial Misconduct
- Real Property-Prescriptive Easement-Public Right of Way
Top stories
- 8th Circuit reverses shoreline use permit revocation
- Missouri Bar committee seeks input on rural legal service gaps
- Appeals court orders new look at conversion therapy case following Supreme Court ruling
- Jury finds seat belt maker liable in $40.5M child injury case
- Injured motorist recovers policy limits, plus medical damages in under a year
- Mother obtains six-figure settlement after rear-end crash leads to lifelong pain
- 8th Circuit affirms denial of preliminary injunction against SB 751
- New dedicated coverage of tech challenges facing law firms and legal departments





